Gen Z Revolt 2025 and the Future of Democratic Renewal in Nepal

Abstract In September 2025, Nepal witnessed a historic youth-led uprising that culminated in the dissolution of parliament and the formation of an interim government. This article situates Nepal’s Gen Z revolt within broader global patterns of democratic fragility and discusses the structural weaknesses inherent to new democracies and the rising aspirations of digitally connected youth. Drawing on comparative experiences of democratic transition and elite capture, the paper argues that the 2025 uprising is symptomatic of governance failures rather than an isolated political rupture. The analysis critically engages with the risks of populism and authoritarian backsliding that often accompany moments of institutional instability, while also identifying pathways through which Nepal might revitalize its democratic foundations and restore public trust.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Society
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-026-01274-1
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gen Z Revolt 2025 and the Future of Democratic Renewal in Nepal

Shrwan Kumar Khanal, Saroj Koirala, Isub Khatiwada, Shobhana Sharma
Society
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal
article

Gen Z Revolt 2025 and the Future of Democratic Renewal in Nepal

Shrwan Kumar Khanal, Saroj Koirala, Isub Khatiwada, Shobhana Sharma
article en

Abstract

Abstract In September 2025, Nepal witnessed a historic youth-led uprising that culminated in the dissolution of parliament and the formation of an interim government. This article situates Nepal’s Gen Z revolt within broader global patterns of democratic fragility and discusses the structural weaknesses inherent to new democracies and the rising aspirations of digitally connected youth. Drawing on comparative experiences of democratic transition and elite capture, the paper argues that the 2025 uprising is symptomatic of governance failures rather than an isolated political rupture. The analysis critically engages with the risks of populism and authoritarian backsliding that often accompany moments of institutional instability, while also identifying pathways through which Nepal might revitalize its democratic foundations and restore public trust.

Society
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.