Dialogue vs. “doing”

This article analyses an annual interfaith run in Luxembourg. Across diversities of backgrounds, ideas about interfaith, and how running works to achieve such a thing, participants maintain that the run is a meaningful and effective way to “do interfaith” and build cross-faith understanding and relationships. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted from 2022 to 2023, I argue that runners cultivate a disposition of play across the event, emphasizing group effort and experience over winning and the unpredictability of race outcomes. These efforts, marked by openness and possibility, are felt by runners to offer new grounds for coming into relation with people of different faiths in contrast to standard interfaith activities, like dialogue. At the same time, the run remains dominated by Christian participants and frames, and involves both silences and assumptions about religion and the disposition required for the run that ultimately reiterate many of the same issues the group aims to counter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/741803
Primary Topic
Religious Tourism and Spaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialogue vs. “doing”

Anastasia Badder
Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory
Religious Tourism and Spaces
article

Dialogue vs. “doing”

Anastasia Badder
article en

Abstract

This article analyses an annual interfaith run in Luxembourg. Across diversities of backgrounds, ideas about interfaith, and how running works to achieve such a thing, participants maintain that the run is a meaningful and effective way to “do interfaith” and build cross-faith understanding and relationships. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted from 2022 to 2023, I argue that runners cultivate a disposition of play across the event, emphasizing group effort and experience over winning and the unpredictability of race outcomes. These efforts, marked by openness and possibility, are felt by runners to offer new grounds for coming into relation with people of different faiths in contrast to standard interfaith activities, like dialogue. At the same time, the run remains dominated by Christian participants and frames, and involves both silences and assumptions about religion and the disposition required for the run that ultimately reiterate many of the same issues the group aims to counter.

Hau Journal of Ethnographic TheoryVol. 16(2)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Religious Tourism and Spaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.