One‐Year Outcomes of High‐Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Versus Without Mechanical Circulatory Support: Propensity Score‐Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND: Impella is increasingly used as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCI). Registry-based data provide insights into the efficacy and safety of Impella-assisted HR-PCI. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate 1-year outcomes of Impella-assisted HR-PCI compared to HR-PCI without MCS. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients undergoing Impella-assisted PCI, included in the IMPELLA-PL registry, were propensity score-matched with controls from the retrospective CardioSilesia registry who underwent HR-PCI without MCS. Study endpoints included 1-year post-discharge all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, rehospitalization for heart failure (HF), and repeat coronary revascularization. RESULTS: Clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable in both groups, with higher rates of dyslipidemia (78.3% vs. 37.7%, p < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (39.9% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.001), and peripheral artery disease (34.1% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001) in the IMPELLA-PL cohort. Intravascular ultrasound was more frequently used in the Impella-supported patients (44.2% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.002), while staged revascularization was more common among controls (30.4% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.007). At 1 year, rates of post-discharge all-cause mortality, stroke, and repeat coronary revascularization were similar in both groups. MI was less frequent in the IMPELLA-PL cohort (1.4% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.003), alongside a trend toward lower incidence of rehospitalizations for HF (9.4% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile, patients who underwent Impella-assisted HR-PCI had similar 1-year post-discharge survival, with a lower rate of MI, compared to propensity score-matched controls who underwent HR-PCI without MCS. Impella may improve HR-PCI outcomes in selected patients, but further randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this finding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70749
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One‐Year Outcomes of High‐Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Versus Without Mechanical Circulatory Support: Propensity Score‐Matched Analysis

Aleksandra Gąsecka, Arkadiusz Pietrasik, Krzysztof Dyrbuś, Grzegorz Smołka et al.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

One‐Year Outcomes of High‐Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Versus Without Mechanical Circulatory Support: Propensity Score‐Matched Analysis

Aleksandra Gąsecka, Arkadiusz Pietrasik, Krzysztof Dyrbuś, Grzegorz Smołka, Katarzyna Mizia­‐Stec, Marek Grygier, Jerzy Sacha, Jakub Michał Zimodro, Andrzej Świątkowski, Mateusz Tajstra, Tomasz Pawłowski, Zbigniew Kalarus, Janusz Kochman, Daniel Cieśla, Wojciech Wojakowski, Paweł Francuz, Mariusz Gąsior
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impella is increasingly used as mechanical circulatory support (MCS) during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCI). Registry-based data provide insights into the efficacy and safety of Impella-assisted HR-PCI. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate 1-year outcomes of Impella-assisted HR-PCI compared to HR-PCI without MCS. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients undergoing Impella-assisted PCI, included in the IMPELLA-PL registry, were propensity score-matched with controls from the retrospective CardioSilesia registry who underwent HR-PCI without MCS. Study endpoints included 1-year post-discharge all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, rehospitalization for heart failure (HF), and repeat coronary revascularization. RESULTS: Clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable in both groups, with higher rates of dyslipidemia (78.3% vs. 37.7%, p < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (39.9% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.001), and peripheral artery disease (34.1% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001) in the IMPELLA-PL cohort. Intravascular ultrasound was more frequently used in the Impella-supported patients (44.2% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.002), while staged revascularization was more common among controls (30.4% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.007). At 1 year, rates of post-discharge all-cause mortality, stroke, and repeat coronary revascularization were similar in both groups. MI was less frequent in the IMPELLA-PL cohort (1.4% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.003), alongside a trend toward lower incidence of rehospitalizations for HF (9.4% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile, patients who underwent Impella-assisted HR-PCI had similar 1-year post-discharge survival, with a lower rate of MI, compared to propensity score-matched controls who underwent HR-PCI without MCS. Impella may improve HR-PCI outcomes in selected patients, but further randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this finding.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Opole University of Technology (PL), Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), Medical University of Silesia (PL), University of Opole (PL), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Ministry of Interior and Administration (PL), Silesian Center for Heart Disease (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.