Deliberation is a Controllable Process Governed by Desirability and Cognitive Effort

Humans spend a lifetime making decisions based on incoming sensory information and goals. Prominent theories of perceptual decision-making have described the components of deliberation process, yet they lack a unifying principle that governs what the nervous system considers to tune deliberation. Desirability (reward) and effort (energy) are major determinants in governing a broad range of human and animal behaviour, such as foraging, walking, and decisions. Here we develop a theory where desirability and cognitive effort tune the control gains that govern deliberation. Several hallmark features of decision behaviour simply emerge from the model, with the deliberation process closely resembling low-dimensional neural dynamics. We also predict and provide a novel mechanistic explanation for “choking-under-pressure”, where extremely large rewards lead to performance deficits. Our principled framework explains both behavioural and neural phenomena while providing a path to unify disparate fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00193.2026
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deliberation is a Controllable Process Governed by Desirability and Cognitive Effort

Joshua G. A. Cashaback, John Buggeln, Isaac Kurtzer, Jan A. Calalo et al.
Journal of Neurophysiology
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Deliberation is a Controllable Process Governed by Desirability and Cognitive Effort

Joshua G. A. Cashaback, John Buggeln, Isaac Kurtzer, Jan A. Calalo, Matthew R. Short, Seth R. Sullivan, Michael J Carter, Truc Ngo, Nicholas R. Muscara
article en

Abstract

Humans spend a lifetime making decisions based on incoming sensory information and goals. Prominent theories of perceptual decision-making have described the components of deliberation process, yet they lack a unifying principle that governs what the nervous system considers to tune deliberation. Desirability (reward) and effort (energy) are major determinants in governing a broad range of human and animal behaviour, such as foraging, walking, and decisions. Here we develop a theory where desirability and cognitive effort tune the control gains that govern deliberation. Several hallmark features of decision behaviour simply emerge from the model, with the deliberation process closely resembling low-dimensional neural dynamics. We also predict and provide a novel mechanistic explanation for “choking-under-pressure”, where extremely large rewards lead to performance deficits. Our principled framework explains both behavioural and neural phenomena while providing a path to unify disparate fields.

Journal of Neurophysiology
New York Institute of Technology (US), University of Delaware (US), McMaster University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.