EXPRESS: Women Can’t Have It All: How Monetization Fuels Sexist Behavior on Livestreaming Platforms

Female streamers face disproportionate sexism on livestreaming platforms, yet the platform features that may drive such behaviors remain underexplored. Across three preregistered studies and a follow-up experiment, the authors show that monetization salience increases sexist behavior toward female creators. When monetization cues are salient, male viewers perceive female streamers as instrumentalizing their sexualization (Study 1), which in turn increases the expression of sexist messages (Study 2). Beyond individual perceptions, monetization signals also reshape social norms: sexist messages are judged as more acceptable by observers when streamers solicit financial support and when such messages are sent by paying (vs. non-paying) subscribers (Study 3 and the follow-up experiment). The authors introduce perceived instrumentalization of sexualization as a key mechanism linking platform monetization features to sexist user behavior. The findings reveal a critical tension in creator economies: mechanisms designed to empower creators financially increase their exposure to social harm. These findings contribute to interactive marketing research by showing how monetization structures shape user behavior and social norms, with implications for platform design and moderation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interactive Marketing
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968261476028
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPRESS: Women Can’t Have It All: How Monetization Fuels Sexist Behavior on Livestreaming Platforms

Sandra Laporte, Malaurie Faure, Andrea Weihrauch
Journal of Interactive Marketing
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
article

EXPRESS: Women Can’t Have It All: How Monetization Fuels Sexist Behavior on Livestreaming Platforms

Sandra Laporte, Malaurie Faure, Andrea Weihrauch
article en

Abstract

Female streamers face disproportionate sexism on livestreaming platforms, yet the platform features that may drive such behaviors remain underexplored. Across three preregistered studies and a follow-up experiment, the authors show that monetization salience increases sexist behavior toward female creators. When monetization cues are salient, male viewers perceive female streamers as instrumentalizing their sexualization (Study 1), which in turn increases the expression of sexist messages (Study 2). Beyond individual perceptions, monetization signals also reshape social norms: sexist messages are judged as more acceptable by observers when streamers solicit financial support and when such messages are sent by paying (vs. non-paying) subscribers (Study 3 and the follow-up experiment). The authors introduce perceived instrumentalization of sexualization as a key mechanism linking platform monetization features to sexist user behavior. The findings reveal a critical tension in creator economies: mechanisms designed to empower creators financially increase their exposure to social harm. These findings contribute to interactive marketing research by showing how monetization structures shape user behavior and social norms, with implications for platform design and moderation.

Journal of Interactive Marketing
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.