A comparative analysis of the performance of geomembrane versus compacted clay cover systems for two landfills in Central Europe

Engineered landfills remain a prevalent municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal method, designed and operated to minimize environmental impacts such as methane (CH 4 ) emissions and leachate production. This study compares the effectiveness of two cover systems in minimizing emissions: geomembrane (GM) and compacted clay liner (CCL) in MSW landfills in Poland and the Czech Republic. Using the Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance model, six scenarios quantified leachate generation and sealing efficiency. Results showed that GM covers reduced the volume of leachate by up to four times compared to CCL (avg. 141.2 m 3 ha −1 ). Analysis of landfill gas (LFG) monitoring data indicated a significant discrepancy in CH 4 emission pattern for CCL ranging from 0.3% to 66.5% of LFG volume, suggesting thatGM covers are more effective in mitigating the emission of greenhouse gas via more organized emissions. The findings address the current gaps in international regulations and support more sustainable landfill closure practices aligned with the European Union Policy and sustainable development goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x261468112
Primary Topic
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of the performance of geomembrane versus compacted clay cover systems for two landfills in Central Europe

Anna Podlasek, Jan Winkler, Magdalena Daria Vaverková, Aleksandra Jakimiuk et al.
Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
article

A comparative analysis of the performance of geomembrane versus compacted clay cover systems for two landfills in Central Europe

Anna Podlasek, Jan Winkler, Magdalena Daria Vaverková, Aleksandra Jakimiuk, Wiktor Sitek, Eugeniusz Koda
article en

Abstract

Engineered landfills remain a prevalent municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal method, designed and operated to minimize environmental impacts such as methane (CH 4 ) emissions and leachate production. This study compares the effectiveness of two cover systems in minimizing emissions: geomembrane (GM) and compacted clay liner (CCL) in MSW landfills in Poland and the Czech Republic. Using the Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance model, six scenarios quantified leachate generation and sealing efficiency. Results showed that GM covers reduced the volume of leachate by up to four times compared to CCL (avg. 141.2 m 3 ha −1 ). Analysis of landfill gas (LFG) monitoring data indicated a significant discrepancy in CH 4 emission pattern for CCL ranging from 0.3% to 66.5% of LFG volume, suggesting thatGM covers are more effective in mitigating the emission of greenhouse gas via more organized emissions. The findings address the current gaps in international regulations and support more sustainable landfill closure practices aligned with the European Union Policy and sustainable development goals.

Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Warsaw University of Life Sciences (PL), Mendel University in Brno (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.