Experimental analysis of ethanol-biodiesel-CuO nanofuel blends in a modern diesel engine under varying EGR and speed conditions

This study examines the combined influence of waste cooking oil-derived second-generation biodiesel (B20), ethanol (5% and 10% v/v), and CuO nanoparticles (50 and 75 ppm) on the combustion, performance, and emission characteristics of a BS VI-compliant diesel engine at 50% load, 500 bar injection pressure, and 23°bTDC injection timing, with EGR ranging from 0% to 30% across speeds of 1500–2500 rpm. All fuel formulations satisfied ASTM specifications, and UV–Visible spectroscopy confirmed nanoparticle suspension stability over 20 days, with absorbance losses below 11%, the smallest decline of 10.9% recorded for B20 + E10 + 75 ppm NPs. The optimum blend, B20 + E10 + 75 ppm NPs, delivered a maximum cylinder pressure of 72.02 bar at 2500 rpm, 15.3% above diesel (62.48 bar), alongside peak net heat release rate of 65.21 J/°CA (10.1% gain) and cumulative heat release rate of 0.749 (16.1% gain), confirming substantial improvement in in-cylinder energy conversion. Brake thermal efficiency reached a maximum of 27.1% at 2500 rpm, 6.3% above diesel, while brake specific fuel consumption attained a minimum of 0.260 kg/kWh, 5.8% below diesel. Under 30% EGR, the optimum blend exhibited a moderate BTE reduction of 4.6%, considerably lower than the 9.0% recorded for diesel, demonstrating greater thermal resilience under diluted intake conditions. Emission measurements showed maximum CO and UHC reductions of 29.7% and 46.7% at 2500 rpm relative to diesel under 0% EGR. NO x peaked at 60 ppm for B20 + E5 + 50 ppm NPs but was reduced to 43 ppm with B20 + E10 + 75 ppm NPs, approaching the diesel baseline of 42 ppm. EGR at 30% further suppressed NO x to 24–31 ppm across all speeds, representing a 42–57% reduction. Three-way ANOVA confirmed statistically significant effects of all three factors on every response variable (p < 0.05), with R² ≥ 98.9% and coefficient of variation below 2%, validating experimental reliability. B20 + E10 + 75 ppm NPs at 2500 rpm and 20% EGR constitutes the most viable sustainable fuel strategy for next-generation compression ignition engines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Sustainability
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2026.100428
Primary Topic
Biodiesel Production and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental analysis of ethanol-biodiesel-CuO nanofuel blends in a modern diesel engine under varying EGR and speed conditions

Jaikumar Sagari, Shesha Sai Gurudatta Koppaka, Raja Sekhar Medidi
Next Sustainability
Biodiesel Production and Applications
article

Experimental analysis of ethanol-biodiesel-CuO nanofuel blends in a modern diesel engine under varying EGR and speed conditions

Jaikumar Sagari, Shesha Sai Gurudatta Koppaka, Raja Sekhar Medidi
article en

Abstract

This study examines the combined influence of waste cooking oil-derived second-generation biodiesel (B20), ethanol (5% and 10% v/v), and CuO nanoparticles (50 and 75 ppm) on the combustion, performance, and emission characteristics of a BS VI-compliant diesel engine at 50% load, 500 bar injection pressure, and 23°bTDC injection timing, with EGR ranging from 0% to 30% across speeds of 1500–2500 rpm. All fuel formulations satisfied ASTM specifications, and UV–Visible spectroscopy confirmed nanoparticle suspension stability over 20 days, with absorbance losses below 11%, the smallest decline of 10.9% recorded for B20 + E10 + 75 ppm NPs. The optimum blend, B20 + E10 + 75 ppm NPs, delivered a maximum cylinder pressure of 72.02 bar at 2500 rpm, 15.3% above diesel (62.48 bar), alongside peak net heat release rate of 65.21 J/°CA (10.1% gain) and cumulative heat release rate of 0.749 (16.1% gain), confirming substantial improvement in in-cylinder energy conversion. Brake thermal efficiency reached a maximum of 27.1% at 2500 rpm, 6.3% above diesel, while brake specific fuel consumption attained a minimum of 0.260 kg/kWh, 5.8% below diesel. Under 30% EGR, the optimum blend exhibited a moderate BTE reduction of 4.6%, considerably lower than the 9.0% recorded for diesel, demonstrating greater thermal resilience under diluted intake conditions. Emission measurements showed maximum CO and UHC reductions of 29.7% and 46.7% at 2500 rpm relative to diesel under 0% EGR. NO x peaked at 60 ppm for B20 + E5 + 50 ppm NPs but was reduced to 43 ppm with B20 + E10 + 75 ppm NPs, approaching the diesel baseline of 42 ppm. EGR at 30% further suppressed NO x to 24–31 ppm across all speeds, representing a 42–57% reduction. Three-way ANOVA confirmed statistically significant effects of all three factors on every response variable (p < 0.05), with R² ≥ 98.9% and coefficient of variation below 2%, validating experimental reliability. B20 + E10 + 75 ppm NPs at 2500 rpm and 20% EGR constitutes the most viable sustainable fuel strategy for next-generation compression ignition engines.

Next SustainabilityVol. 8
Indian Maritime University (IN), GITAM University (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Biodiesel Production and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.