From Tectonic Theory to Architectural Practice: The EMU Student Services Building

This study examines how tectonic theory can inform the analysis of contemporary architectural practice through the case of the EMU Student Services Building. It develops a framework based on materiality, construction, detail, architectural experience, and the relation between design intention and construction realisation. Using a qualitative interpretive case-study approach, the research draws on drawings, project documents, photographs, on-site observation, and construction-process information. The analysis focuses on structural expression, material articulation, tectonic detail, spatial experience, and the transformation of tectonic intention from proposal to built form. The findings show that tectonic ideas are not transferred directly from theory into practice, but are negotiated through constructional constraints, material substitutions, and implementation decisions, particularly in the shift from the intended steel structure to the realised reinforced concrete system. Rather than treating tectonics as static, the study redefines tectonic expression as a negotiated process shaped by intention, material transformation, constructional limitation, and realised experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1729840
Primary Topic
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Tectonic Theory to Architectural Practice: The EMU Student Services Building

Hasan Doğan
Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
article

From Tectonic Theory to Architectural Practice: The EMU Student Services Building

Hasan Doğan
article en

Abstract

This study examines how tectonic theory can inform the analysis of contemporary architectural practice through the case of the EMU Student Services Building. It develops a framework based on materiality, construction, detail, architectural experience, and the relation between design intention and construction realisation. Using a qualitative interpretive case-study approach, the research draws on drawings, project documents, photographs, on-site observation, and construction-process information. The analysis focuses on structural expression, material articulation, tectonic detail, spatial experience, and the transformation of tectonic intention from proposal to built form. The findings show that tectonic ideas are not transferred directly from theory into practice, but are negotiated through constructional constraints, material substitutions, and implementation decisions, particularly in the shift from the intended steel structure to the realised reinforced concrete system. Rather than treating tectonics as static, the study redefines tectonic expression as a negotiated process shaped by intention, material transformation, constructional limitation, and realised experience.

Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)Vol. 11(1)
Harran University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Tectonic Theory to Architectural Practice: The EMU Student Services Building — Hasan Doğan · Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS