Is ‘Typically Developing’ Really Typical? Reimagining Deaf Literacies Through Crip Linguistics

ABSTRACT Crip linguistics is a philosophical framework for considering how various people with different access and experiences (e.g., deaf individuals, people with diagnosed language disabilities, DeafBlind people) use language. This framework is asset‐based and assumes that language differences are not language disorders. In this Viewpoints article, we explore the literacy development of those with language differences from a Crip linguistics perspective. We argue that various ways of being literate have inherent value, and should not inherently be considered as disabilities or disorders in need of remediation. We provide recommendations for teachers working with students with language differences, including exposing children to language varieties, providing opportunities for meaningful engagement with print, broadening text exposure, and rethinking assessment practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Reading Teacher
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.70084
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is ‘Typically Developing’ Really Typical? Reimagining Deaf Literacies Through Crip Linguistics

Ashley Greene, Jessica Scott, Christopher Black, Mallorie D. Evans
The Reading Teacher
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Is ‘Typically Developing’ Really Typical? Reimagining Deaf Literacies Through Crip Linguistics

Ashley Greene, Jessica Scott, Christopher Black, Mallorie D. Evans
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Crip linguistics is a philosophical framework for considering how various people with different access and experiences (e.g., deaf individuals, people with diagnosed language disabilities, DeafBlind people) use language. This framework is asset‐based and assumes that language differences are not language disorders. In this Viewpoints article, we explore the literacy development of those with language differences from a Crip linguistics perspective. We argue that various ways of being literate have inherent value, and should not inherently be considered as disabilities or disorders in need of remediation. We provide recommendations for teachers working with students with language differences, including exposing children to language varieties, providing opportunities for meaningful engagement with print, broadening text exposure, and rethinking assessment practices.

The Reading TeacherVol. 80(2)
Georgia State University (US), Gallaudet University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.