Machiavelli on <i>Materia: Virtù</i> , Conflict, and Mixed Government

This article reconstructs Machiavelli’s materia as the historically specific and internally differentiated field within which political action occurs. While scholarship on Machiavelli has shown the constitutive role of conflict between the grandi and the popolo in the formation of laws and institutions, less attention has been given to materia as the field that makes such conflict politically productive or destructive. I argue that materia names a dynamic configuration of forces—including social orders, arms, offices, passions, habits, and material conditions—within which political form is founded, tested, and exposed to corruption. In The Prince, virtù appears as the practical capacity to seize an opportunity and work on an available materia under the pressure of fortuna. In the Discourses, mixed government does not abolish conflict but institutionalizes it, enabling a divided materia to sustain and renew political order over time. Read in this way, Machiavelli does not treat matter as a passive substrate awaiting form. He treats political order as an immanent and anti-teleological achievement: a provisional form that depends on its capacity to organize, absorb, and periodically renew the antagonisms that threaten to undo it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Legacy
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2026.2708385
Primary Topic
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machiavelli on Materia: Virtù , Conflict, and Mixed Government

Rao Shanshan
The European Legacy
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
article

Machiavelli on Materia: Virtù , Conflict, and Mixed Government

Rao Shanshan
article en

Abstract

This article reconstructs Machiavelli’s materia as the historically specific and internally differentiated field within which political action occurs. While scholarship on Machiavelli has shown the constitutive role of conflict between the grandi and the popolo in the formation of laws and institutions, less attention has been given to materia as the field that makes such conflict politically productive or destructive. I argue that materia names a dynamic configuration of forces—including social orders, arms, offices, passions, habits, and material conditions—within which political form is founded, tested, and exposed to corruption. In The Prince, virtù appears as the practical capacity to seize an opportunity and work on an available materia under the pressure of fortuna. In the Discourses, mixed government does not abolish conflict but institutionalizes it, enabling a divided materia to sustain and renew political order over time. Read in this way, Machiavelli does not treat matter as a passive substrate awaiting form. He treats political order as an immanent and anti-teleological achievement: a provisional form that depends on its capacity to organize, absorb, and periodically renew the antagonisms that threaten to undo it.

The European Legacy
University of Bologna (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Machiavelli on <i>Materia: Virtù</i> , Conflict, and Mixed Government — Rao Shanshan · The European Legacy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS