The Efficacy and Safety of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Advanced Heart Failure Receiving Intravenous Inotropes

Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used for prognostic assessment and risk stratification in patients with heart failure (HF). However, its feasibility and clinical utility in patients with advanced HF requiring intravenous inotropic support remain unclear. Methods: This observational study included hospitalized patients with HF who received intravenous inotropic therapy and underwent CPET during index hospitalization. The primary outcome was a composite of HF rehospitalization or cardiovascular death. Results: A total of 528 patients hospitalized for HF required intravenous inotropic therapy; 50 patients were included. CPET was safely completed in all patients without exercise-related adverse events. The median peak VO2 was 12.5 mL/kg/min, and the median VE/VCO2 slope was 38.3. During a median follow-up of 762 days, 12 primary events occurred. In univariable analysis, the VE/VCO2 slope, O2 pulse, and maximal workload were significantly associated with the primary outcome, whereas peak VO2 was not. A VE/VCO2 slope > 38.2 was associated with a significantly higher 3-year event rate compared with a slope ≤ 38.2 (40% vs. 8%, p = 0.021). Conclusions: CPET is feasible and safe in highly selected patients with advanced HF requiring inotropic support, and the VE/VCO2 slope was associated with clinical outcomes in exploratory univariable analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13080354
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Efficacy and Safety of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Advanced Heart Failure Receiving Intravenous Inotropes

Masaki Nakagaito, Teruhiko Imamura, Koichiro Kinugawa, Ryuichi Ushijima et al.
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

The Efficacy and Safety of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Advanced Heart Failure Receiving Intravenous Inotropes

Masaki Nakagaito, Teruhiko Imamura, Koichiro Kinugawa, Ryuichi Ushijima, Makiko Nakamura, Yuki Hida, Toshihide Izumida
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely used for prognostic assessment and risk stratification in patients with heart failure (HF). However, its feasibility and clinical utility in patients with advanced HF requiring intravenous inotropic support remain unclear. Methods: This observational study included hospitalized patients with HF who received intravenous inotropic therapy and underwent CPET during index hospitalization. The primary outcome was a composite of HF rehospitalization or cardiovascular death. Results: A total of 528 patients hospitalized for HF required intravenous inotropic therapy; 50 patients were included. CPET was safely completed in all patients without exercise-related adverse events. The median peak VO2 was 12.5 mL/kg/min, and the median VE/VCO2 slope was 38.3. During a median follow-up of 762 days, 12 primary events occurred. In univariable analysis, the VE/VCO2 slope, O2 pulse, and maximal workload were significantly associated with the primary outcome, whereas peak VO2 was not. A VE/VCO2 slope > 38.2 was associated with a significantly higher 3-year event rate compared with a slope ≤ 38.2 (40% vs. 8%, p = 0.021). Conclusions: CPET is feasible and safe in highly selected patients with advanced HF requiring inotropic support, and the VE/VCO2 slope was associated with clinical outcomes in exploratory univariable analyses.

Journal of Cardiovascular Development and DiseaseVol. 13(8)
University of Toyama (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.