It's A Matter of Perspective: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Civil Servants’ Appraisal and Coping with Negative Civil Servant Stereotypes

Negative civil servant stereotypes are often described as problematic in public administration research. In this study, we investigate municipal employees’ own ideas on whether and how these stereotypes form a problem for public sector work and public services. Using semi-structured interviewing and reflexive thematic analysis and building on psychological literature on appraisal and coping with stereotypes, we identify two themes. First, respondents use different perspectives to understand and explain the stereotypes: They view stereotypes as (1) undeserved and untrue, (2) inevitable and part of the work, (3) understandable misunderstandings, and/or (4) reflections of truth. While these external attributions help respondents cope with the negative stereotypes, they also come with blind spots that could affect their work. Second, respondents think the stereotypes have a bigger impact on the citizen-government relationship, trust, and citizen-state interactions than on civil servants themselves. We discuss the implications for service delivery in the public sector and directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Review of Public Administration
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740261471536
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It's A Matter of Perspective: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Civil Servants’ Appraisal and Coping with Negative Civil Servant Stereotypes

Carina Schott, Isa Bertram
The American Review of Public Administration
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

It's A Matter of Perspective: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Civil Servants’ Appraisal and Coping with Negative Civil Servant Stereotypes

Carina Schott, Isa Bertram
article en

Abstract

Negative civil servant stereotypes are often described as problematic in public administration research. In this study, we investigate municipal employees’ own ideas on whether and how these stereotypes form a problem for public sector work and public services. Using semi-structured interviewing and reflexive thematic analysis and building on psychological literature on appraisal and coping with stereotypes, we identify two themes. First, respondents use different perspectives to understand and explain the stereotypes: They view stereotypes as (1) undeserved and untrue, (2) inevitable and part of the work, (3) understandable misunderstandings, and/or (4) reflections of truth. While these external attributions help respondents cope with the negative stereotypes, they also come with blind spots that could affect their work. Second, respondents think the stereotypes have a bigger impact on the citizen-government relationship, trust, and citizen-state interactions than on civil servants themselves. We discuss the implications for service delivery in the public sector and directions for future research.

The American Review of Public Administration
Utrecht University (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.