Intentional incisions on Neolithic Obsidian arrowheads from Central Anatolia: A techno-functional and iconographic approach

Incised obsidian arrowheads form a rare and geographically restricted artifact class, known exclusively from Neolithic Central Anatolia between the late 8th and 7th millennia BCE. These artifacts, marked by deliberate incisions, have been variously interpreted as symbolic or identity-related. This study presents a comprehensive techno-functional and iconographic analysis of eleven newly identified specimens from Tepecik-Çiftlik (Cappadocia, Türkiye), adding to the regional corpus of 43 known examples. The incised arrowheads were found in dwelling sites, a chipped stone workshop, and during surveys.Provenance analysis by macroscopic characterization confirms their production from local Cappadocian obsidian sources (Göllüdağ, Nenezi Dağ). The incisions are highly variable, and show no correlation with raw material, chaîne opératoire , typology, or use-wear. Incisions were executed both before and after final retouching, suggesting no fixed production stage. Comparative analysis reveals parallels between sites, indicating a possible shared but flexible iconographic repertoire. The rarity of these artifacts, their relation to domestic contexts, and their absence beyond Central Anatolia point to the hypothesis of a shared cultural practice. The analysis of these incised arrowheads, along with the limited archaeological and ethnographic comparisons available, calls for a cautious interpretation. While they have been suggested as personal or collective markers (e.g., hunters’ marks), this hypothesis requires further evidence. The expanded dataset from Tepecik-Çiftlik refines the understanding of this peculiar practice, highlighting its persistence despite broader cultural change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354715
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intentional incisions on Neolithic Obsidian arrowheads from Central Anatolia: A techno-functional and iconographic approach

Denis Guilbeau, Alice Vinet
PLoS ONE
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Intentional incisions on Neolithic Obsidian arrowheads from Central Anatolia: A techno-functional and iconographic approach

Denis Guilbeau, Alice Vinet
article en

Abstract

Incised obsidian arrowheads form a rare and geographically restricted artifact class, known exclusively from Neolithic Central Anatolia between the late 8th and 7th millennia BCE. These artifacts, marked by deliberate incisions, have been variously interpreted as symbolic or identity-related. This study presents a comprehensive techno-functional and iconographic analysis of eleven newly identified specimens from Tepecik-Çiftlik (Cappadocia, Türkiye), adding to the regional corpus of 43 known examples. The incised arrowheads were found in dwelling sites, a chipped stone workshop, and during surveys.Provenance analysis by macroscopic characterization confirms their production from local Cappadocian obsidian sources (Göllüdağ, Nenezi Dağ). The incisions are highly variable, and show no correlation with raw material, chaîne opératoire , typology, or use-wear. Incisions were executed both before and after final retouching, suggesting no fixed production stage. Comparative analysis reveals parallels between sites, indicating a possible shared but flexible iconographic repertoire. The rarity of these artifacts, their relation to domestic contexts, and their absence beyond Central Anatolia point to the hypothesis of a shared cultural practice. The analysis of these incised arrowheads, along with the limited archaeological and ethnographic comparisons available, calls for a cautious interpretation. While they have been suggested as personal or collective markers (e.g., hunters’ marks), this hypothesis requires further evidence. The expanded dataset from Tepecik-Çiftlik refines the understanding of this peculiar practice, highlighting its persistence despite broader cultural change.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.