Explaining Corporate Tax Avoidance

The tax avoidance literature identifies dozens of variables that are related to corporate tax avoidance, but it lacks a framework for understanding the relative importance of these variables and the theories that drive these relations. We distill decades of tax avoidance research into key theories and create a unified sample that contains 31 independent variables from prior literature to quantify the relative and total importance of proposed explanations. Using Shapley value variance decomposition, we show that investment-related factors and operating metrics dominate effective tax rate (ETR) measures and consistently rank high across a range of tax avoidance proxies. When we examine the relative importance of time-invariant effects, we find that manager, firm, and segment fixed effects explain the greatest variation in tax avoidance. We offer several actionable opportunities for future research and offer several key takeaways for researchers and policymakers. This paper was accepted by Eric So, accounting. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04839 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04839
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining Corporate Tax Avoidance

Jacob R. Thornock, Andrew Belnap, Kaitlyn Kroeger
Management Science
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Explaining Corporate Tax Avoidance

Jacob R. Thornock, Andrew Belnap, Kaitlyn Kroeger
article en

Abstract

The tax avoidance literature identifies dozens of variables that are related to corporate tax avoidance, but it lacks a framework for understanding the relative importance of these variables and the theories that drive these relations. We distill decades of tax avoidance research into key theories and create a unified sample that contains 31 independent variables from prior literature to quantify the relative and total importance of proposed explanations. Using Shapley value variance decomposition, we show that investment-related factors and operating metrics dominate effective tax rate (ETR) measures and consistently rank high across a range of tax avoidance proxies. When we examine the relative importance of time-invariant effects, we find that manager, firm, and segment fixed effects explain the greatest variation in tax avoidance. We offer several actionable opportunities for future research and offer several key takeaways for researchers and policymakers. This paper was accepted by Eric So, accounting. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04839 .

Management Science
Brigham Young University (US), University of Iowa (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.