Goodness-of-fit tests for the Dirichlet distribution

Abstract We propose two new goodness-of-fit tests for the Dirichlet distribution. The first test exploits the Darroch–Ratcliff characterisation of neutrality, whereas the second quantifies the discrepancy between the empirical characteristic function and a numerical approximation to the Dirichlet characteristic function. We discuss asymptotic aspects of both tests and, through a simulation study, show that they are competitive alternatives to the very limited number of tests currently available in the literature. An application to several classical compositional datasets further illustrates the practical utility of the proposed methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrika
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-026-01042-5
Primary Topic
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Goodness-of-fit tests for the Dirichlet distribution

Charl Pretorius, Shawn Liebenberg, Mduduzi Maphosa, Roelof Coetzer
Metrika
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
article

Goodness-of-fit tests for the Dirichlet distribution

Charl Pretorius, Shawn Liebenberg, Mduduzi Maphosa, Roelof Coetzer
article en

Abstract

Abstract We propose two new goodness-of-fit tests for the Dirichlet distribution. The first test exploits the Darroch–Ratcliff characterisation of neutrality, whereas the second quantifies the discrepancy between the empirical characteristic function and a numerical approximation to the Dirichlet characteristic function. We discuss asymptotic aspects of both tests and, through a simulation study, show that they are competitive alternatives to the very limited number of tests currently available in the literature. An application to several classical compositional datasets further illustrates the practical utility of the proposed methods.

Metrika
North-West University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.