Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Survey

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in medical image segmentation is essential for ensuring the reliability and interpretability of deep learning models in clinical decision-making. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer-based architectures have achieved remarkable segmentation performance, they often provide deterministic outputs without accounting for uncertainty, which can lead to overconfident predictions in ambiguous cases. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of UQ techniques in medical image segmentation, categorizing existing approaches into Bayesian methods, deep ensembles, deterministic methods, test-time data augmentation, and hybrid models, while treating foundation-model-based UQ as a separate cross-cutting category. We examine key methodologies, including Monte Carlo dropout, Bayesian neural networks, variational inference, and ensemble learning, discussing their advantages and limitations in addressing aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Additionally, we explore the clinical relevance of UQ by reviewing its applications in brain tumor segmentation, cardiac imaging, lung nodule detection, and other medical domains. The paper also highlights key evaluation metrics, such as calibration errors, uncertainty–error correlation, and visual interpretability, to assess the effectiveness of UQ methods. Finally, we discuss challenges and future research directions, emphasizing the need for scalable, interpretable, and clinically actionable uncertainty quantification strategies to improve trust in AI-assisted medical image analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Imaging
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12080341
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Survey

Seyed Sina Ziaee, Katie Ovens
Journal of Imaging
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Survey

Seyed Sina Ziaee, Katie Ovens
article en

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in medical image segmentation is essential for ensuring the reliability and interpretability of deep learning models in clinical decision-making. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer-based architectures have achieved remarkable segmentation performance, they often provide deterministic outputs without accounting for uncertainty, which can lead to overconfident predictions in ambiguous cases. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of UQ techniques in medical image segmentation, categorizing existing approaches into Bayesian methods, deep ensembles, deterministic methods, test-time data augmentation, and hybrid models, while treating foundation-model-based UQ as a separate cross-cutting category. We examine key methodologies, including Monte Carlo dropout, Bayesian neural networks, variational inference, and ensemble learning, discussing their advantages and limitations in addressing aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Additionally, we explore the clinical relevance of UQ by reviewing its applications in brain tumor segmentation, cardiac imaging, lung nodule detection, and other medical domains. The paper also highlights key evaluation metrics, such as calibration errors, uncertainty–error correlation, and visual interpretability, to assess the effectiveness of UQ methods. Finally, we discuss challenges and future research directions, emphasizing the need for scalable, interpretable, and clinically actionable uncertainty quantification strategies to improve trust in AI-assisted medical image analysis.

Journal of ImagingVol. 12(8)
University of Calgary (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.