AI assistance for fetal ultrasound interpretation in a multi-reader study

Abstract Prenatal detection rates of congenital anomalies range from 25 to 90%. Artificial intelligence (AI) may improve detection by supporting physicians during image interpretation. We performed a multireader, multicase retrospective study of Sonio Suspect (FDA‑cleared, K243614; Paris, France) detecting 8 fetal abnormal ultrasound findings on still images: malposition of the great vessels, absence or unusual size of at least one of the three vessels, disequilibrium or absence of at least one of the two ventricles, thoracic situs inversus, abdominal situs inversus, non-visibility of a single stomach bubble or abnormally big stomach, absence of the cavum septum pellucidum, absence of the corpus callosum. Thirteen U.S. physicians (maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, radiology) reviewed 750 images (250 with abnormal findings) once unassisted and once with AI. With AI assistance, AUC presented a mean improvement of 21.9 percentage points (68.9% to 90.9%, p < 0.001). With AI, sensitivity was overall improved (88.5% vs. 54.2%, p < 0.01), as was specificity (87.9% vs. 80.7%, p < 0.01), inter-reader agreement (72% vs 26%) and interpretation time (23 vs 40 s per image). AI assistance significantly improved reader performance in detecting fetal abnormalities without compromising specificity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03037-y
Primary Topic
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI assistance for fetal ultrasound interpretation in a multi-reader study

Yinka Oyelese, R. Besson, Célia Amabile, Frédéric Logé-Munerel et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
article

AI assistance for fetal ultrasound interpretation in a multi-reader study

Yinka Oyelese, R. Besson, Célia Amabile, Frédéric Logé-Munerel, Julien Stirnemann, Clémentine Morisset, Yves Ville, Guillaume Corda, Asma Khalil
article en

Abstract

Abstract Prenatal detection rates of congenital anomalies range from 25 to 90%. Artificial intelligence (AI) may improve detection by supporting physicians during image interpretation. We performed a multireader, multicase retrospective study of Sonio Suspect (FDA‑cleared, K243614; Paris, France) detecting 8 fetal abnormal ultrasound findings on still images: malposition of the great vessels, absence or unusual size of at least one of the three vessels, disequilibrium or absence of at least one of the two ventricles, thoracic situs inversus, abdominal situs inversus, non-visibility of a single stomach bubble or abnormally big stomach, absence of the cavum septum pellucidum, absence of the corpus callosum. Thirteen U.S. physicians (maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, radiology) reviewed 750 images (250 with abnormal findings) once unassisted and once with AI. With AI assistance, AUC presented a mean improvement of 21.9 percentage points (68.9% to 90.9%, p < 0.001). With AI, sensitivity was overall improved (88.5% vs. 54.2%, p < 0.01), as was specificity (87.9% vs. 80.7%, p < 0.01), inter-reader agreement (72% vs 26%) and interpretation time (23 vs 40 s per image). AI assistance significantly improved reader performance in detecting fetal abnormalities without compromising specificity.

npj Digital Medicine
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.