Effect of Drip and Micro-Sprinkler Irrigation Systems on the Yield of Chinese Garlic (Allium sativum L.) in the Peruvian Altiplano

Water scarcity in the Peruvian Altiplano demands irrigation strategies that optimise water use without compromising agricultural productivity. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of drip irrigation and micro-sprinkler irrigation on the agronomic development, water balance, and yield of Chinese garlic (Allium sativum L.) in the community of Challapujo, Ilave, Puno, during the 2021–2022 growing season. Six plots were evaluated under two localised irrigation treatments: T-1 (drip) and T-2 (micro-sprinkler). The irrigation scheduling was based on a daily water balance, accounting for evapotranspiration, precipitation, effective root depth, and soil moisture thresholds. The soil exhibited analogous hydro-physical characteristics across treatments, with a bulk density of 1.28 g cm−3, a field capacity of 20.31%, and a permanent wilting point of 10.33% for T-1 and values of 1.31 g cm−3, 19.99%, and 10.16%, respectively, for T-2. The C-factor was calculated based the actual volume applied and the effectively wetted area, estimated at 80% for drip irrigation and close to 100% for micro-sprinklers. During the 190-day growing period, 84 effective irrigation events and a cumulative precipitation of 424.30 mm were recorded. Treatment T-1 required 1099.98 min of irrigation and applied 223.87 mm, whereas T-2 required 1280.75 min and 346.76 mm; this represented an absolute saving of 122.89 mm and a 35.5% reduction in favour of drip irrigation. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed regarding to plant height, pseudostem diameter, leaf length, pre-bulbing stage, number of leaves, or yield—with values of 14.70 t ha−1 for T-1 and 14.83 t ha−1 for T-2. In conclusion, both systems yielded equivalent agronomic results, but drip irrigation demonstrated superior water-use efficiency, making it a technically favourable alternative for high-Andean production systems with limited water availability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Horticulturae
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12080928
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Drip and Micro-Sprinkler Irrigation Systems on the Yield of Chinese Garlic (Allium sativum L.) in the Peruvian Altiplano

Edwin Huayhua Huamaní, José Luis Pineda Tapia, Raúl Reynaldo Ito Díaz, Germán Mamani Uturunco et al.
Horticulturae
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

Effect of Drip and Micro-Sprinkler Irrigation Systems on the Yield of Chinese Garlic (Allium sativum L.) in the Peruvian Altiplano

Edwin Huayhua Huamaní, José Luis Pineda Tapia, Raúl Reynaldo Ito Díaz, Germán Mamani Uturunco, Roberto Alfaro-Alejo, Deyna Lozano Ccopa, Milton Quispe Tisnado, Verónica Flores Alca, Silvio Ubaldo Sanchez-Condori, Yesica Magnolia Mamani-Arpasi, Godofredo Huanca-Chambi, Luz Marina Teves-Ponce, Chander Antony Calle-Ccama
article en

Abstract

Water scarcity in the Peruvian Altiplano demands irrigation strategies that optimise water use without compromising agricultural productivity. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of drip irrigation and micro-sprinkler irrigation on the agronomic development, water balance, and yield of Chinese garlic (Allium sativum L.) in the community of Challapujo, Ilave, Puno, during the 2021–2022 growing season. Six plots were evaluated under two localised irrigation treatments: T-1 (drip) and T-2 (micro-sprinkler). The irrigation scheduling was based on a daily water balance, accounting for evapotranspiration, precipitation, effective root depth, and soil moisture thresholds. The soil exhibited analogous hydro-physical characteristics across treatments, with a bulk density of 1.28 g cm−3, a field capacity of 20.31%, and a permanent wilting point of 10.33% for T-1 and values of 1.31 g cm−3, 19.99%, and 10.16%, respectively, for T-2. The C-factor was calculated based the actual volume applied and the effectively wetted area, estimated at 80% for drip irrigation and close to 100% for micro-sprinklers. During the 190-day growing period, 84 effective irrigation events and a cumulative precipitation of 424.30 mm were recorded. Treatment T-1 required 1099.98 min of irrigation and applied 223.87 mm, whereas T-2 required 1280.75 min and 346.76 mm; this represented an absolute saving of 122.89 mm and a 35.5% reduction in favour of drip irrigation. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed regarding to plant height, pseudostem diameter, leaf length, pre-bulbing stage, number of leaves, or yield—with values of 14.70 t ha−1 for T-1 and 14.83 t ha−1 for T-2. In conclusion, both systems yielded equivalent agronomic results, but drip irrigation demonstrated superior water-use efficiency, making it a technically favourable alternative for high-Andean production systems with limited water availability.

HorticulturaeVol. 12(8)
Universidad Andina Néstor Cáceres Velásquez (PE), Universidad Nacional del Altiplano (PE), National University of Engineering (PE)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.