Explicit Control versus Implicit Inference In interactive AI systems

This paper investigates the tension between explicit user customization and implicit behavioral inference in conversational AI systems, framing this dynamic as a fundamental concern for user autonomy and epistemic accuracy. It defines "inferential ossification" as a critical failure mode in which systems conflate transient situational needs with permanent dispositional traits, thereby restricting the user's agency and depth of interaction. To evaluate and mitigate these risks, the study introduces a five-dimensional framework spanning legibility, correctability, ownership, paternalism, and homogenization and proposes hybrid design patterns such as editable inferences and mandatory explicit overrides. Finally, it formulates actionable policy and design recommendations for regulators and user advocates to ensure adaptive AI architectures balance automated convenience with human agency.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21648712
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Explicit Control versus Implicit Inference In interactive AI systems

Momen Ghazouani
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Explicit Control versus Implicit Inference In interactive AI systems

Momen Ghazouani
preprint en

Abstract

This paper investigates the tension between explicit user customization and implicit behavioral inference in conversational AI systems, framing this dynamic as a fundamental concern for user autonomy and epistemic accuracy. It defines "inferential ossification" as a critical failure mode in which systems conflate transient situational needs with permanent dispositional traits, thereby restricting the user's agency and depth of interaction. To evaluate and mitigate these risks, the study introduces a five-dimensional framework spanning legibility, correctability, ownership, paternalism, and homogenization and proposes hybrid design patterns such as editable inferences and mandatory explicit overrides. Finally, it formulates actionable policy and design recommendations for regulators and user advocates to ensure adaptive AI architectures balance automated convenience with human agency.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.