Procedural and Long‐Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In‐Stent Chronic Total Occlusion

BACKGROUND: This study examined procedural success and long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) compared with de novo CTO. While contemporary techniques have improved acute success rates for IS-CTO PCI, data on long-term outcomes remain limited. AIMS: We aimed to examine procedural success rates for IS-CTO PCI using contemporary techniques, evaluate long-term clinical outcomes with extended follow-up, identify independent predictors of major adverse cardiac events, and compare our findings with recent multicenter registries. METHODS: We analyzed 501 consecutive CTO PCI procedures in 456 patients at our institution between January 2018 and December 2023. Patients were stratified into IS (n = 82, 16.4%) and de novo CTO (n = 419, 83.6%) groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of in-stent restenosis requiring revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke at median follow-up of 713.5 days. Cox proportional hazards regression identified predictors of adverse events. RESULTS: Patients with IS-CTO had a higher prevalence of diabetes (58.5% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.067) and prior myocardial infarction (46.3% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.001). Procedural success was similar (86.6% vs. 79.5%, p = 0.136) with comparable in-hospital complications. However, at median follow-up of 713.5 days, patients with IS-CTO experienced higher rates of the composite endpoint (26.4% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.003), driven by in-stent restenosis (20.8% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.001). After adjustment, IS-CTO showed a trend toward increased risk for composite outcome (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.00-4.11). Independent predictors of composite outcome included heart failure (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.17-3.94) and male sex (protective: HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Despite achieving procedural success comparable to de novo CTO, IS-CTO PCI is associated with significantly worse long-term outcomes over extended follow-up, particularly recurrent restenosis. These findings underscore the need for improved therapeutic strategies in this challenging population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70772
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procedural and Long‐Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In‐Stent Chronic Total Occlusion

Gal Sella, Jerrin Philip, Rody G. Bou Chaaya, Neal S. Kleiman et al.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Procedural and Long‐Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In‐Stent Chronic Total Occlusion

Gal Sella, Jerrin Philip, Rody G. Bou Chaaya, Neal S. Kleiman, Alpesh Shah, Yueh-Yun Lin, Muhammad Haisum Maqsood, Anshuj Deva, Chloe Kharsa, Yasser M. Sammour, Mangesh Kritya
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined procedural success and long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) compared with de novo CTO. While contemporary techniques have improved acute success rates for IS-CTO PCI, data on long-term outcomes remain limited. AIMS: We aimed to examine procedural success rates for IS-CTO PCI using contemporary techniques, evaluate long-term clinical outcomes with extended follow-up, identify independent predictors of major adverse cardiac events, and compare our findings with recent multicenter registries. METHODS: We analyzed 501 consecutive CTO PCI procedures in 456 patients at our institution between January 2018 and December 2023. Patients were stratified into IS (n = 82, 16.4%) and de novo CTO (n = 419, 83.6%) groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of in-stent restenosis requiring revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke at median follow-up of 713.5 days. Cox proportional hazards regression identified predictors of adverse events. RESULTS: Patients with IS-CTO had a higher prevalence of diabetes (58.5% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.067) and prior myocardial infarction (46.3% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.001). Procedural success was similar (86.6% vs. 79.5%, p = 0.136) with comparable in-hospital complications. However, at median follow-up of 713.5 days, patients with IS-CTO experienced higher rates of the composite endpoint (26.4% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.003), driven by in-stent restenosis (20.8% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.001). After adjustment, IS-CTO showed a trend toward increased risk for composite outcome (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.00-4.11). Independent predictors of composite outcome included heart failure (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.17-3.94) and male sex (protective: HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Despite achieving procedural success comparable to de novo CTO, IS-CTO PCI is associated with significantly worse long-term outcomes over extended follow-up, particularly recurrent restenosis. These findings underscore the need for improved therapeutic strategies in this challenging population.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Houston Methodist (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.