Has Pupil Premium funding improved school outcomes for pupils from low-income households in England?

This paper reports the first substantive use of the Pupil Parent Matched Dataset linking household income for all school pupils in England to the National Pupil Database. There is a strong linear relationship between earned-income bands and attainment at school. Income bands are strong predictors of attainment, preferable perhaps to FSM-eligibility and other indicators of disadvantage in current use. Using a fuzzy discontinuity approach we show that pupils from very low-income households have become less clustered in schools since the introduction of Pupil Premium funding in 2011. Low earned-income pupils have also improved their attainment disproportionately relative to high-income pupils. These results based on earned income confirm our earlier analyses based on pupils with long-term disadvantage. They provide more evidence that outcomes for socioeconomically poor pupils have improved, although it is not clear to what extent the changes can be directly attributed to the in the Pupil Premium policy itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Studies
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2026.2710333
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Has Pupil Premium funding improved school outcomes for pupils from low-income households in England?

Nadia Siddiqui, Stephen Gorard
Educational Studies
School Choice and Performance
article

Has Pupil Premium funding improved school outcomes for pupils from low-income households in England?

Nadia Siddiqui, Stephen Gorard
article en

Abstract

This paper reports the first substantive use of the Pupil Parent Matched Dataset linking household income for all school pupils in England to the National Pupil Database. There is a strong linear relationship between earned-income bands and attainment at school. Income bands are strong predictors of attainment, preferable perhaps to FSM-eligibility and other indicators of disadvantage in current use. Using a fuzzy discontinuity approach we show that pupils from very low-income households have become less clustered in schools since the introduction of Pupil Premium funding in 2011. Low earned-income pupils have also improved their attainment disproportionately relative to high-income pupils. These results based on earned income confirm our earlier analyses based on pupils with long-term disadvantage. They provide more evidence that outcomes for socioeconomically poor pupils have improved, although it is not clear to what extent the changes can be directly attributed to the in the Pupil Premium policy itself.

Educational Studies
Durham University (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Has Pupil Premium funding improved school outcomes for pupils from low-income households in England? — Nadia Siddiqui, Stephen Gorard · Educational Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS