Incidence and etiology of impediments to spinal cord stimulator trial progression

Background Spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trials are used to assess therapy efficacy before permanent implantation. Despite initial candidacy, not all patients proceed to SCS trial. Comprehending potential barriers to SCS therapy could offer strategies to enhance patient access. Objective The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence and etiology of impediments to SCS trial progression unrelated to preoperative MRI findings. Methods A retrospective chart review of a single center identified patients who were under consideration for SCS trial from September 2013 to July 2023. Impediments to trial progression were classified from electronic health records. Demographic variables and time intervals were analyzed using logistic regression and a non-parametric test. Results This retrospective study identified 358 patients considered for an SCS trial of which 84 (23.5%) did not progress. Relevant impediment classifications included: medical reasons (39.8%), patient-directed decisions (25.8%), insurance or financial responsibilities (16.1%), MRI-documented contraindications (10.8%), and psychiatric concerns (7.5%). In the multivariable logistic regression, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS; b = −0.82, p = 0.04) was the only demographic variable significantly associated with non-progression to trial. Conclusion Across all SCS trial candidates, 20.7% did not progress for reasons unrelated to MRI findings. SCS trial progression was hindered by medical, personal, and financial challenges during the preoperative period. These findings highlight a need for enhancing patient access and optimizing preprocedural processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Pain Medicine
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpm.2026.100803
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence and etiology of impediments to spinal cord stimulator trial progression

David Provenzano, Jason Kilgore, Erin E. Alpaugh, Esha Vaidya
Interventional Pain Medicine
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Incidence and etiology of impediments to spinal cord stimulator trial progression

David Provenzano, Jason Kilgore, Erin E. Alpaugh, Esha Vaidya
article en

Abstract

Background Spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trials are used to assess therapy efficacy before permanent implantation. Despite initial candidacy, not all patients proceed to SCS trial. Comprehending potential barriers to SCS therapy could offer strategies to enhance patient access. Objective The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence and etiology of impediments to SCS trial progression unrelated to preoperative MRI findings. Methods A retrospective chart review of a single center identified patients who were under consideration for SCS trial from September 2013 to July 2023. Impediments to trial progression were classified from electronic health records. Demographic variables and time intervals were analyzed using logistic regression and a non-parametric test. Results This retrospective study identified 358 patients considered for an SCS trial of which 84 (23.5%) did not progress. Relevant impediment classifications included: medical reasons (39.8%), patient-directed decisions (25.8%), insurance or financial responsibilities (16.1%), MRI-documented contraindications (10.8%), and psychiatric concerns (7.5%). In the multivariable logistic regression, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS; b = −0.82, p = 0.04) was the only demographic variable significantly associated with non-progression to trial. Conclusion Across all SCS trial candidates, 20.7% did not progress for reasons unrelated to MRI findings. SCS trial progression was hindered by medical, personal, and financial challenges during the preoperative period. These findings highlight a need for enhancing patient access and optimizing preprocedural processes.

Interventional Pain MedicineVol. 5(3)
Washington and Jefferson College (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.