Axial compressive capacity of concrete‐filled steel tube columns: Experimental investigation, regression modeling, and code evaluation

Abstract Concrete‐filled steel tube (CFST) columns have gained popularity due to their ability to sustain a high axial load and composite action in structural applications; however, their axial strength is difficult to predict This study presents a combined experimental and data‐driven study on the axial compressive capacity of CFST columns. Under concentric axial load, CFST specimens were experimentally tested. These specimens consisted of three concrete types and three configurations of steel tubes in order to assess load‐deformation behavior and ultimate strength. In an effort to enhance strength prediction, an extensive database containing 862 experimentally tested CFST columns from 96 published studies was constructed. From this database, five multivariable regression models were created to predict the ultimate axial load (): linear, nonlinear, pure quadratic, interaction, and full quadratic (FQ). The models were evaluated using the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), the root mean square error, and the mean absolute error. Of all the models tested, the most accurate predictor was the FQ regression model, which produced R 2 values of over 0.986 for . In order to examine the accuracy in predicting the axial strength of the models, the optimal regression model's predictions were compared to the Eurocode 4 and American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) 360‐10 design codes. From the findings, it can be observed that the regression‐based approach significantly outperforms existing code formulations, proving to be a useful approach in the design and assessment of CFST columns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70663
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Axial compressive capacity of concrete‐filled steel tube columns: Experimental investigation, regression modeling, and code evaluation

Kamaran Mohammed Kareem, Faraydon Hama Rash W. Mahmod, Mohammed Mahmood Ahmed
Structural Concrete
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Axial compressive capacity of concrete‐filled steel tube columns: Experimental investigation, regression modeling, and code evaluation

Kamaran Mohammed Kareem, Faraydon Hama Rash W. Mahmod, Mohammed Mahmood Ahmed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Concrete‐filled steel tube (CFST) columns have gained popularity due to their ability to sustain a high axial load and composite action in structural applications; however, their axial strength is difficult to predict This study presents a combined experimental and data‐driven study on the axial compressive capacity of CFST columns. Under concentric axial load, CFST specimens were experimentally tested. These specimens consisted of three concrete types and three configurations of steel tubes in order to assess load‐deformation behavior and ultimate strength. In an effort to enhance strength prediction, an extensive database containing 862 experimentally tested CFST columns from 96 published studies was constructed. From this database, five multivariable regression models were created to predict the ultimate axial load (): linear, nonlinear, pure quadratic, interaction, and full quadratic (FQ). The models were evaluated using the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), the root mean square error, and the mean absolute error. Of all the models tested, the most accurate predictor was the FQ regression model, which produced R 2 values of over 0.986 for . In order to examine the accuracy in predicting the axial strength of the models, the optimal regression model's predictions were compared to the Eurocode 4 and American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) 360‐10 design codes. From the findings, it can be observed that the regression‐based approach significantly outperforms existing code formulations, proving to be a useful approach in the design and assessment of CFST columns.

Structural Concrete
University of Halabja (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.