The governance of digital convergence: cybersecurity maturity and AI readiness in the European Union

Purpose This study aims to investigate the structural alignment between national cybersecurity maturity and government artificial intelligence (AI) readiness across the EU-27. It specifically examines how the statistical relationship between these domains shifts following the 2025 methodological recalibration of the government AI readiness index (GARI), exploring what these changes reveal about the transition from foundational digital strategy to implementation-oriented governance within the European digital regulatory framework. Design/methodology/approach The research uses a comparative quantitative design, integrating the global cybersecurity index (GCI, 2024) with the GARI 2024 and GARI 2025 datasets. The analysis uses Pearson and Spearman correlations, Steiger’s test for comparing dependent overlapping correlations and a two-stage clustering procedure, incorporating hierarchical Ward’s linkage followed by k-means classification, to assess typological stability and national governance profiles. Findings The results indicate that the nexus between cybersecurity maturity and AI readiness remains statistically stable despite the 2025 GARI recalibration. However, pillar-level decomposition reveals that AI readiness is most strongly associated with operational cybersecurity dimensions, specifically capacity development and cooperation, rather than formal legal preparedness. The transition to an implementation-centric framework in 2025 exposes a significant implementation gap among member states, where high structural security scores do not coincide with operational AI resilience or public-sector adoption. Originality/value This paper contributes new empirical evidence to the debate on digital benchmarking by demonstrating how the recalibration of composite indicators serves as a diagnostic instrument for identifying structural gaps between strategic preparedness and operational capacity. It offers a novel comparative framework for understanding the coevolution of cybersecurity and AI governance as a unified institutional capability within the EU Digital Single Market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-04-2026-0254
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The governance of digital convergence: cybersecurity maturity and AI readiness in the European Union

Martin Lněnička, Jana Medková
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

The governance of digital convergence: cybersecurity maturity and AI readiness in the European Union

Martin Lněnička, Jana Medková
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the structural alignment between national cybersecurity maturity and government artificial intelligence (AI) readiness across the EU-27. It specifically examines how the statistical relationship between these domains shifts following the 2025 methodological recalibration of the government AI readiness index (GARI), exploring what these changes reveal about the transition from foundational digital strategy to implementation-oriented governance within the European digital regulatory framework. Design/methodology/approach The research uses a comparative quantitative design, integrating the global cybersecurity index (GCI, 2024) with the GARI 2024 and GARI 2025 datasets. The analysis uses Pearson and Spearman correlations, Steiger’s test for comparing dependent overlapping correlations and a two-stage clustering procedure, incorporating hierarchical Ward’s linkage followed by k-means classification, to assess typological stability and national governance profiles. Findings The results indicate that the nexus between cybersecurity maturity and AI readiness remains statistically stable despite the 2025 GARI recalibration. However, pillar-level decomposition reveals that AI readiness is most strongly associated with operational cybersecurity dimensions, specifically capacity development and cooperation, rather than formal legal preparedness. The transition to an implementation-centric framework in 2025 exposes a significant implementation gap among member states, where high structural security scores do not coincide with operational AI resilience or public-sector adoption. Originality/value This paper contributes new empirical evidence to the debate on digital benchmarking by demonstrating how the recalibration of composite indicators serves as a diagnostic instrument for identifying structural gaps between strategic preparedness and operational capacity. It offers a novel comparative framework for understanding the coevolution of cybersecurity and AI governance as a unified institutional capability within the EU Digital Single Market.

Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
University of Hradec Králové (CZ)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.