Everyday Discrimination and Health Care Utilization Among US Adults

Importance: Everyday discrimination, defined as repeated exposure to subtle slights and unfair treatment, has been reported to be associated with adverse health outcomes, but its association with health care use remains incompletely understood. Objective: To examine the association between everyday discrimination and health care use among US adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 27 384 National Health Interview Survey respondents 18 years and older who completed the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) in 2023. Statistical analysis was performed from August to October 2025. Exposure: Everyday discrimination was measured using the validated 5-item EDS, with composite scores ranging from 0 to 20 (higher scores indicate greater discrimination). Main Outcomes and Measures: Four categories of binary, self-reported health care outcomes across multiple timeframes were examined: delayed or forgone care, health care visits, cancer screenings, and vaccinations and other preventive screenings. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% CIs were estimated using survey-weighted logistic regression, adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, and clinical covariates. Results: The sample included 27 384 adults (mean [SD] age, 48.1 [18.5] years; 51.2% female [weighted percentage]). The mean (SD) EDS score was 2.48 (3.34). Higher EDS scores were associated with increased odds of cost-related barriers to medical care (AOR per 1-point increase, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11-1.15) and prescription medications (AOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.12-1.16). Higher scores were also associated with greater use of emergency department visits (AOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06), urgent care (AOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06) but lower odds of physician visits (AOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99) and dental visits (AOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99). Everyday discrimination was associated with lower engagement in cholesterol testing (AOR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97) and diabetes screening (AOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.98). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of 27 384 US adults, higher everyday discrimination scores were associated with higher reliance on emergency services and lower engagement with preventive care. Interventions addressing interpersonal and structural forms of discrimination, including culturally responsive care, implicit bias training, patient navigation programs, and expanded primary care access, are essential to reduce discrimination's impact on health care use and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.24373
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Everyday Discrimination and Health Care Utilization Among US Adults

David T. Zhu, Jaya Aysola, John C. Lin
JAMA Network Open
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Everyday Discrimination and Health Care Utilization Among US Adults

David T. Zhu, Jaya Aysola, John C. Lin
article en

Abstract

Importance: Everyday discrimination, defined as repeated exposure to subtle slights and unfair treatment, has been reported to be associated with adverse health outcomes, but its association with health care use remains incompletely understood. Objective: To examine the association between everyday discrimination and health care use among US adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 27 384 National Health Interview Survey respondents 18 years and older who completed the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) in 2023. Statistical analysis was performed from August to October 2025. Exposure: Everyday discrimination was measured using the validated 5-item EDS, with composite scores ranging from 0 to 20 (higher scores indicate greater discrimination). Main Outcomes and Measures: Four categories of binary, self-reported health care outcomes across multiple timeframes were examined: delayed or forgone care, health care visits, cancer screenings, and vaccinations and other preventive screenings. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% CIs were estimated using survey-weighted logistic regression, adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, and clinical covariates. Results: The sample included 27 384 adults (mean [SD] age, 48.1 [18.5] years; 51.2% female [weighted percentage]). The mean (SD) EDS score was 2.48 (3.34). Higher EDS scores were associated with increased odds of cost-related barriers to medical care (AOR per 1-point increase, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11-1.15) and prescription medications (AOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.12-1.16). Higher scores were also associated with greater use of emergency department visits (AOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06), urgent care (AOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06) but lower odds of physician visits (AOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99) and dental visits (AOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99). Everyday discrimination was associated with lower engagement in cholesterol testing (AOR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97) and diabetes screening (AOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.98). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of 27 384 US adults, higher everyday discrimination scores were associated with higher reliance on emergency services and lower engagement with preventive care. Interventions addressing interpersonal and structural forms of discrimination, including culturally responsive care, implicit bias training, patient navigation programs, and expanded primary care access, are essential to reduce discrimination's impact on health care use and outcomes.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(7)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of Pennsylvania Health System (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.