Building and Sustaining Patient Engagement Infrastructure Focused on Overdose Prevention Within a US Veterans Affairs National Research Network

INTRODUCTION: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has funded intramural research for over 100 years. A growing number of research funders, including VA, have placed an increasing emphasis on engaging patients in the research process and have invested in engagement infrastructure; however, few accounts are available that detail that infrastructure. This article describes the process and outcomes to plan, build, operate, and evaluate an Overdose Prevention Veteran Engagement (VE) Panel. METHODS: We employed multiple methods to document panel creation and operation, including authors' experiences, polls, and surveys. A nine-member Planning Committee, including both researchers and Veterans, worked over 4 months to establish processes for panel member recruitment, selection, and orientation. Ongoing service practices were created and documented, including researcher recruitment, meeting planning, and continuous improvement efforts. Authors' reflections on contributors to panel success were solicited and shared. RESULTS: A 12-member national VE panel was created. Three orientation sessions prepared members for their responsibilities, helped them feel confident in their roles, and connect with each other. After orientation, the panel met with unique research teams on seven occasions (average meeting attendance, 78%). Both Veterans and researchers reported high satisfaction via post-meeting evaluations. All consultations produced Veteran-inspired changes to researchers' projects. CONCLUSIONS: VA partners created an engagement consultation service bringing researchers together with Veteran patients who have both lived experience with drug use and an interest in reducing harms from substance use. Detailed processes and tools used to develop this successful engagement infrastructure may be adapted for use in other settings or with other pressing public health issues. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Veterans with lived experience related to overdose prevention collaborated on the design and operation of the patient engagement service described in this work and as co-authors of this article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70774
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building and Sustaining Patient Engagement Infrastructure Focused on Overdose Prevention Within a US Veterans Affairs National Research Network

Agnes Jensen, Tracy L. Sides, Jessica Padilla, Gay R. Thomas et al.
Health Expectations
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Building and Sustaining Patient Engagement Infrastructure Focused on Overdose Prevention Within a US Veterans Affairs National Research Network

Agnes Jensen, Tracy L. Sides, Jessica Padilla, Gay R. Thomas, Justeen Hyde, Malloree M. Argust, Matthew McCoy, Kyle Miedema, Ronald E. Kidd, William C. Becker, Rob Langford
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has funded intramural research for over 100 years. A growing number of research funders, including VA, have placed an increasing emphasis on engaging patients in the research process and have invested in engagement infrastructure; however, few accounts are available that detail that infrastructure. This article describes the process and outcomes to plan, build, operate, and evaluate an Overdose Prevention Veteran Engagement (VE) Panel. METHODS: We employed multiple methods to document panel creation and operation, including authors' experiences, polls, and surveys. A nine-member Planning Committee, including both researchers and Veterans, worked over 4 months to establish processes for panel member recruitment, selection, and orientation. Ongoing service practices were created and documented, including researcher recruitment, meeting planning, and continuous improvement efforts. Authors' reflections on contributors to panel success were solicited and shared. RESULTS: A 12-member national VE panel was created. Three orientation sessions prepared members for their responsibilities, helped them feel confident in their roles, and connect with each other. After orientation, the panel met with unique research teams on seven occasions (average meeting attendance, 78%). Both Veterans and researchers reported high satisfaction via post-meeting evaluations. All consultations produced Veteran-inspired changes to researchers' projects. CONCLUSIONS: VA partners created an engagement consultation service bringing researchers together with Veteran patients who have both lived experience with drug use and an interest in reducing harms from substance use. Detailed processes and tools used to develop this successful engagement infrastructure may be adapted for use in other settings or with other pressing public health issues. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Veterans with lived experience related to overdose prevention collaborated on the design and operation of the patient engagement service described in this work and as co-authors of this article.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(4)
Boston University (US), University of Minnesota (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Yale University (US), VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US), Bedford VA Research Corporation (US), Clinical Physiology Associates (US), VA New England Healthcare System (US), Military University (RU), Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US), Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior (US), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.