Bacterial identification in clinical samples – comparing Nanopore and Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA and rpoB genes

Abstract Background Recent improvements in the sequencing accuracy of the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform have increased its suitability for clinical microbiology applications, including broad-range amplification and sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene directly from clinical samples. This approach has a strong potential to improve diagnosis of bacterial infections. However, even full-length 16S rRNA sequencing may lack sufficient resolution to distinguish closely related species, a limitation exacerbated by the remaining ONT error rate. The rpoB gene represents a high-resolution bacterial phylogenetic marker that offers improved species-level discrimination. We evaluated a strategy combining ONT sequencing of the V1-V3 segment of the 16S rRNA gene and a segment of the rpoB gene. In addition, we assessed two novel pipelines designed specifically for the analysis of ONT amplicon data in clinical microbiology, where knowing the associated confidence level for a given identification is crucial, as is the ability to detect organisms that may not be represented in reference databases. Methods A staggered mock community and 25 abdominal abscess samples were investigated using ONT sequencing of the 16S rRNA and rpoB genes, with Illumina sequencing of the same genes used as a comparator method to validate the analytical accuracy of the approach. Results rpoB ONT sequencing achieved species-level identification in 91.2% of detections, as compared to 62.8% with 16S rRNA ONT sequencing. However, 16S rRNA ONT sequencing obtained a higher sensitivity of 93%, as compared to 83.7% for rpoB ONT sequencing. Combining 16S rRNA and rpoB ONT sequencing yielded a sensitivity of 98.8% with 89% species-level discrimination. For both gene targets, ONT sequencing paralleled Illumina sequencing. Conclusions Combining ONT sequencing with high-sensitivity broad-range amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and amplification of the rpoB gene for enhanced taxonomic resolution enables accurate detection and species-level identification of bacteria directly from clinical samples. This approach represents a rapid, flexible and cost-efficient tool for culture-independent diagnostics in clinical microbiology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-14101-z
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bacterial identification in clinical samples – comparing Nanopore and Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA and rpoB genes

Joanna Małgorzata Bivand, Øyvind Kommedal, Ruben Dyrhovden, Robin Patel et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Bacterial identification in clinical samples – comparing Nanopore and Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA and rpoB genes

Joanna Małgorzata Bivand, Øyvind Kommedal, Ruben Dyrhovden, Robin Patel, Audun Sivertsen, Marit Gjerde Tellevik, Oystein Saebo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent improvements in the sequencing accuracy of the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform have increased its suitability for clinical microbiology applications, including broad-range amplification and sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene directly from clinical samples. This approach has a strong potential to improve diagnosis of bacterial infections. However, even full-length 16S rRNA sequencing may lack sufficient resolution to distinguish closely related species, a limitation exacerbated by the remaining ONT error rate. The rpoB gene represents a high-resolution bacterial phylogenetic marker that offers improved species-level discrimination. We evaluated a strategy combining ONT sequencing of the V1-V3 segment of the 16S rRNA gene and a segment of the rpoB gene. In addition, we assessed two novel pipelines designed specifically for the analysis of ONT amplicon data in clinical microbiology, where knowing the associated confidence level for a given identification is crucial, as is the ability to detect organisms that may not be represented in reference databases. Methods A staggered mock community and 25 abdominal abscess samples were investigated using ONT sequencing of the 16S rRNA and rpoB genes, with Illumina sequencing of the same genes used as a comparator method to validate the analytical accuracy of the approach. Results rpoB ONT sequencing achieved species-level identification in 91.2% of detections, as compared to 62.8% with 16S rRNA ONT sequencing. However, 16S rRNA ONT sequencing obtained a higher sensitivity of 93%, as compared to 83.7% for rpoB ONT sequencing. Combining 16S rRNA and rpoB ONT sequencing yielded a sensitivity of 98.8% with 89% species-level discrimination. For both gene targets, ONT sequencing paralleled Illumina sequencing. Conclusions Combining ONT sequencing with high-sensitivity broad-range amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and amplification of the rpoB gene for enhanced taxonomic resolution enables accurate detection and species-level identification of bacteria directly from clinical samples. This approach represents a rapid, flexible and cost-efficient tool for culture-independent diagnostics in clinical microbiology.

BMC Infectious Diseases
Mayo Clinic (US), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), TiGenix (Spain) (ES), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), University of Bergen (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.