A comparative study of the growth, yield, and physiological responses of arbosana, arbequina, coratina, and maraqi olive cultivars

Abstract Expanding olive cultivation into newly reclaimed sandy soils faces challenges from salinity, low fertility, and limited water-holding capacity. Success depends critically on cultivar selection, yet comparative information remains limited. This study evaluated four olive cultivars (‘Arbosana’, ‘Arbequina’, ‘Coratina’, ‘Maraqi’) in Egypt’s Wadi Al-Natrun region over two seasons (2024–2025) using a randomized complete block design with four replications. Measurements included vegetative growth, physiological stress indicators (SPAD, RWC, proline), reproductive traits, yield components, fruit properties, and oil content. Significant genotypic variation ( p < 0.001) revealed three distinct performance profiles. ‘Coratina’ showed the most vigorous growth (canopy volume: 8.2–8.5 m³) and highest yield (21.2–22.5 kg tree⁻¹) and oil content (51.0–52.0%), but exhibited lowest RWC (68.8–75.4%), highest proline (12.5–14.2 µmol g⁻¹ FW), and lowest fruit set (0.9–1.2%). ‘Arbequina’ and ‘Arbosana’ showed constrained growth (3.1–3.6 m³) but maintained high RWC (78.9–87.2%), low proline (3.1–6.5 µmol g⁻¹ FW), superior fruit set (3.3–4.2%), and highest yield efficiency (3.6–3.8 kg m⁻³). ‘Maraqi’ displayed intermediate growth (5.6 m³) with highest RWC (86.2–88.5%) and lowest proline (2.8–3.0 µmol g⁻¹ FW), but yield efficiency was low (2.8 kg m⁻³) and fruit set declined 21.4% in the second season. Significant Cultivar × Year interactions indicated differential environmental sensitivity. No single cultivar is universally superior; optimal selection depends on matching performance profiles to production goals, orchard design, and resource availability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-57940-1
Primary Topic
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of the growth, yield, and physiological responses of arbosana, arbequina, coratina, and maraqi olive cultivars

Abd El-wahed N. Abd El-wahed, Ashraf Hamdy, Eman N. Mustafa, Sahar I. El-shennawy et al.
Scientific Reports
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
article

A comparative study of the growth, yield, and physiological responses of arbosana, arbequina, coratina, and maraqi olive cultivars

Abd El-wahed N. Abd El-wahed, Ashraf Hamdy, Eman N. Mustafa, Sahar I. El-shennawy, Ibrahim A. Elnaggar, Hosny F. Abdel-Aziz, Alsayed E. Mekky
article en

Abstract

Abstract Expanding olive cultivation into newly reclaimed sandy soils faces challenges from salinity, low fertility, and limited water-holding capacity. Success depends critically on cultivar selection, yet comparative information remains limited. This study evaluated four olive cultivars (‘Arbosana’, ‘Arbequina’, ‘Coratina’, ‘Maraqi’) in Egypt’s Wadi Al-Natrun region over two seasons (2024–2025) using a randomized complete block design with four replications. Measurements included vegetative growth, physiological stress indicators (SPAD, RWC, proline), reproductive traits, yield components, fruit properties, and oil content. Significant genotypic variation ( p < 0.001) revealed three distinct performance profiles. ‘Coratina’ showed the most vigorous growth (canopy volume: 8.2–8.5 m³) and highest yield (21.2–22.5 kg tree⁻¹) and oil content (51.0–52.0%), but exhibited lowest RWC (68.8–75.4%), highest proline (12.5–14.2 µmol g⁻¹ FW), and lowest fruit set (0.9–1.2%). ‘Arbequina’ and ‘Arbosana’ showed constrained growth (3.1–3.6 m³) but maintained high RWC (78.9–87.2%), low proline (3.1–6.5 µmol g⁻¹ FW), superior fruit set (3.3–4.2%), and highest yield efficiency (3.6–3.8 kg m⁻³). ‘Maraqi’ displayed intermediate growth (5.6 m³) with highest RWC (86.2–88.5%) and lowest proline (2.8–3.0 µmol g⁻¹ FW), but yield efficiency was low (2.8 kg m⁻³) and fruit set declined 21.4% in the second season. Significant Cultivar × Year interactions indicated differential environmental sensitivity. No single cultivar is universally superior; optimal selection depends on matching performance profiles to production goals, orchard design, and resource availability.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Al-Azhar University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.