Evaluating memory B cell cross-reactivity between ancestral and future SARS-CoV-2 variants — evidence for original antigenic sin 2219641

Abstract Introduction A hallmark of adaptive immunity is the generation of immunological memory and ability to mount a robust recall response following encounter with the same antigen. In the context of mutable pathogens, the specificity of memory B cells (Bmem) generated following the initial exposure can constrain the response elicited by an antigenic drift variant — a phenomenon referred to as “original antigenic sin”. Methods To investigate whether human donors with verified SARS-CoV-2 infection in early 2022, likely with Omicron (BA.1), generated variant-specific Bmem responses or whether WH1-reactive Bmem were preferentially boosted, we established a novel ImmunoSpot assay to assess cross-reactivity at single-cell resolution. Results Bmem capable of recognizing BA.1 RBD were already present in convalescent donors collected early in the COVID-19 pandemic, and such secretory footprints were equally labelled with WH1 and BA.1 RBD probes. In contrast, assessment of Bmem following BA.1 infection revealed an increased frequency of WH1/BA.1 dual-reactivity and few, if any, BA.1 strain-specific footprints providing evidence for preferential boosting of Bmem recognizing shared epitopes. Moreover, we observed increased heterogeneity in the size of the secretory footprints revealed by the RBD probes, indicating cross-reactive Bmem maintained an increased affinity for the WH1 strain. Conclusion Collectively, multi-color inverted assays provide a suitable methodology for assessment of Bmem cross-reactivity in larger donor cohorts. Funding Source N/A Topic Categories Viral Immunology (VIR)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jimmun/vkag141.006
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating memory B cell cross-reactivity between ancestral and future SARS-CoV-2 variants — evidence for original antigenic sin 2219641

Noémi Becza, Lingling Yao, Paul Lehmann, Greg Kirchenbaum
The Journal of Immunology
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

Evaluating memory B cell cross-reactivity between ancestral and future SARS-CoV-2 variants — evidence for original antigenic sin 2219641

Noémi Becza, Lingling Yao, Paul Lehmann, Greg Kirchenbaum
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction A hallmark of adaptive immunity is the generation of immunological memory and ability to mount a robust recall response following encounter with the same antigen. In the context of mutable pathogens, the specificity of memory B cells (Bmem) generated following the initial exposure can constrain the response elicited by an antigenic drift variant — a phenomenon referred to as “original antigenic sin”. Methods To investigate whether human donors with verified SARS-CoV-2 infection in early 2022, likely with Omicron (BA.1), generated variant-specific Bmem responses or whether WH1-reactive Bmem were preferentially boosted, we established a novel ImmunoSpot assay to assess cross-reactivity at single-cell resolution. Results Bmem capable of recognizing BA.1 RBD were already present in convalescent donors collected early in the COVID-19 pandemic, and such secretory footprints were equally labelled with WH1 and BA.1 RBD probes. In contrast, assessment of Bmem following BA.1 infection revealed an increased frequency of WH1/BA.1 dual-reactivity and few, if any, BA.1 strain-specific footprints providing evidence for preferential boosting of Bmem recognizing shared epitopes. Moreover, we observed increased heterogeneity in the size of the secretory footprints revealed by the RBD probes, indicating cross-reactive Bmem maintained an increased affinity for the WH1 strain. Conclusion Collectively, multi-color inverted assays provide a suitable methodology for assessment of Bmem cross-reactivity in larger donor cohorts. Funding Source N/A Topic Categories Viral Immunology (VIR)

The Journal of ImmunologyVol. 215(Supplement_1)
Cellular Engineering Technologies (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.