Role Captivity in Former Dementia Caregivers: Constrained Choice, Role Engulfment and Caregiver Wellbeing in Ageing Care

Background/Objectives: Family caregiving for people living with dementia is central to ageing and long-term care, but it is not only a practical arrangement but also a relational and structurally shaped experience. Care may be grounded in affection, responsibility, and connection, while still becoming difficult to refuse, share, or limit. Although caregiver burden is well documented, less is known about how former caregivers retrospectively appraise the caregiving role after active care has ended. This study examined role captivity among former family caregivers, focusing on constrained choice, subjective role engulfment, perceived support, and caregiver wellbeing. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional mixed-methods survey was conducted among 180 former family caregivers of people living with dementia in Northern Italy. Quantitative analyses examined associations between role-captivity-related indicators and retrospective caregiving outcomes. Open-ended responses were analysed using theory-informed qualitative content analysis. Results: Constrained choice at caregiving uptake was reported by 22.2% of participants, and 56.1% met the criterion for subjective role engulfment. Overall, 60.0% would provide family care again, while only 28.3% would be willing to receive family care themselves. One in five reported caregiving-related health problems. In multivariable models, constrained choice was associated with lower willingness to provide care again (OR = 0.27, p = 0.002) and less positive retrospective appraisal (OR = 0.35, p = 0.036). Subjective role engulfment was independently associated with less positive appraisal (OR = 0.36, p = 0.008), while perceived support was associated with positive appraisal (OR = 6.31, p < 0.001) and perceived processing (OR = 2.68, p = 0.013). Qualitative findings showed that caregiving was often remembered as meaningful and relationally important, yet difficult to refuse, progressively all-consuming, and shaped by structural and informational barriers. Conclusions: Retrospective appraisal of family dementia caregiving depends not only on care demands, but also on whether care was experienced as chosen, bounded, shared, and supported. Role captivity helps identify when relationally meaningful care becomes difficult to sustain and highlights the need for caregiver-sensitive dementia care that protects agency, role boundaries, and access to timely support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geriatrics
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics11040094
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role Captivity in Former Dementia Caregivers: Constrained Choice, Role Engulfment and Caregiver Wellbeing in Ageing Care

Giuliano Piccoliori, Adolf Engl, Klaus Eisendle, Barbara Plagg et al.
Geriatrics
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Role Captivity in Former Dementia Caregivers: Constrained Choice, Role Engulfment and Caregiver Wellbeing in Ageing Care

Giuliano Piccoliori, Adolf Engl, Klaus Eisendle, Barbara Plagg, Doris Hager von Strobele-Prainsack, Petra Wlasak, Heidi Flarer
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Family caregiving for people living with dementia is central to ageing and long-term care, but it is not only a practical arrangement but also a relational and structurally shaped experience. Care may be grounded in affection, responsibility, and connection, while still becoming difficult to refuse, share, or limit. Although caregiver burden is well documented, less is known about how former caregivers retrospectively appraise the caregiving role after active care has ended. This study examined role captivity among former family caregivers, focusing on constrained choice, subjective role engulfment, perceived support, and caregiver wellbeing. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional mixed-methods survey was conducted among 180 former family caregivers of people living with dementia in Northern Italy. Quantitative analyses examined associations between role-captivity-related indicators and retrospective caregiving outcomes. Open-ended responses were analysed using theory-informed qualitative content analysis. Results: Constrained choice at caregiving uptake was reported by 22.2% of participants, and 56.1% met the criterion for subjective role engulfment. Overall, 60.0% would provide family care again, while only 28.3% would be willing to receive family care themselves. One in five reported caregiving-related health problems. In multivariable models, constrained choice was associated with lower willingness to provide care again (OR = 0.27, p = 0.002) and less positive retrospective appraisal (OR = 0.35, p = 0.036). Subjective role engulfment was independently associated with less positive appraisal (OR = 0.36, p = 0.008), while perceived support was associated with positive appraisal (OR = 6.31, p < 0.001) and perceived processing (OR = 2.68, p = 0.013). Qualitative findings showed that caregiving was often remembered as meaningful and relationally important, yet difficult to refuse, progressively all-consuming, and shaped by structural and informational barriers. Conclusions: Retrospective appraisal of family dementia caregiving depends not only on care demands, but also on whether care was experienced as chosen, bounded, shared, and supported. Role captivity helps identify when relationally meaningful care becomes difficult to sustain and highlights the need for caregiver-sensitive dementia care that protects agency, role boundaries, and access to timely support.

GeriatricsVol. 11(4)
Ospedale di Bolzano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.