ELISA-Based Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Detection as a Fit-for-Purpose Alternative to Cell-Based Assays for Biotherapeutic Immunogenicity Assessment 2266841

Abstract Introduction Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are a critical component of the adaptive immune response to biotherapeutic agents, capable of blocking biological function, altering pharmacokinetics, and reducing clinical efficacy. Conventional cell-based assays remain the gold standard for NAb detection because they capture functional activity, yet they are inherently variable due to cell-line dependence, receptor expression, and complex assay validation requirements. To address these challenges, we evaluated ELISA-based NAb assays as fit-for-purpose alternatives that model the same ligand—receptor interactions in a controlled, reproducible format. Methods Competitive ligand-binding ELISAs were designed for three representative biotherapeutic classes: monoclonal antibody, peptide drug, and peptibody. Each assay quantified the inhibition of drug—target interaction by NAbs through measurable signal reduction. Reference NAb standards were spiked across defined concentration ranges, and results were benchmarked against published cell-based assay data. Analytical performance was assessed for sensitivity, precision, accuracy, and cut-point determination per ICH M10 and FDA Bioanalytical Guidelines. Results All three ELISA formats demonstrated strong linearity (R² > 0.99) and precision (CV < 10%) across working ranges, with sensitivity comparable to published cell-based data. Inhibition profiles correlated closely with reported cellular responses, confirming mechanistic equivalence in binding blockade. The assays offered enhanced reproducibility, reduced turnaround time, and simplified validation. Conclusion ELISA-based NAb detection represents a scientifically robust, cost-effective, and high-throughput approach for immunogenicity assessment of diverse biologics. By modeling immune neutralization through ligand—receptor competition, this platform provides a fit-for-purpose surrogate to traditional cell-based assays, advancing standardized and reproducible immunogenicity evaluation in translational immunology. Funding Source n/a Topic Categories Technological Innovations in Immunology (TECH)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jimmun/vkag141.1110
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ELISA-Based Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Detection as a Fit-for-Purpose Alternative to Cell-Based Assays for Biotherapeutic Immunogenicity Assessment 2266841

Krisha Jain, Kalpesh Jain
The Journal of Immunology
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

ELISA-Based Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Detection as a Fit-for-Purpose Alternative to Cell-Based Assays for Biotherapeutic Immunogenicity Assessment 2266841

Krisha Jain, Kalpesh Jain
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are a critical component of the adaptive immune response to biotherapeutic agents, capable of blocking biological function, altering pharmacokinetics, and reducing clinical efficacy. Conventional cell-based assays remain the gold standard for NAb detection because they capture functional activity, yet they are inherently variable due to cell-line dependence, receptor expression, and complex assay validation requirements. To address these challenges, we evaluated ELISA-based NAb assays as fit-for-purpose alternatives that model the same ligand—receptor interactions in a controlled, reproducible format. Methods Competitive ligand-binding ELISAs were designed for three representative biotherapeutic classes: monoclonal antibody, peptide drug, and peptibody. Each assay quantified the inhibition of drug—target interaction by NAbs through measurable signal reduction. Reference NAb standards were spiked across defined concentration ranges, and results were benchmarked against published cell-based assay data. Analytical performance was assessed for sensitivity, precision, accuracy, and cut-point determination per ICH M10 and FDA Bioanalytical Guidelines. Results All three ELISA formats demonstrated strong linearity (R² > 0.99) and precision (CV < 10%) across working ranges, with sensitivity comparable to published cell-based data. Inhibition profiles correlated closely with reported cellular responses, confirming mechanistic equivalence in binding blockade. The assays offered enhanced reproducibility, reduced turnaround time, and simplified validation. Conclusion ELISA-based NAb detection represents a scientifically robust, cost-effective, and high-throughput approach for immunogenicity assessment of diverse biologics. By modeling immune neutralization through ligand—receptor competition, this platform provides a fit-for-purpose surrogate to traditional cell-based assays, advancing standardized and reproducible immunogenicity evaluation in translational immunology. Funding Source n/a Topic Categories Technological Innovations in Immunology (TECH)

The Journal of ImmunologyVol. 215(Supplement_1)
Centre for BioSystems Genomics (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.