Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Manufacturing Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Resin‐Based Restorations

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of repaired milled and 3D-printed resin restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 84 resin specimens (8 mm diameter, 5 mm height) fabricated using two different methods such as milling (Grandio Disc) and 3D-printing (Saremco Crowntec) were subjected to three surface treatments: silane (control), air abrasion + silane, and laser irradiation + silane. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles each) before and after the repair protocol which was conducted with a flowable composite, and the shear bond strengths were measured. SEM images were obtained to evaluate the type of failures. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS V23, and two-way ANOVA analysis was used for comparisons between surface treatments and samples (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Laser irradiation yielded the highest bond strength (7.61 ± 1.94 MPa), showing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). The 3D-printed resin group exhibited significantly higher bond strengths after all surface treatments compared to the milled group (p = 0.028). Representative SEM observations revealed increased surface irregularity and fracture-surface complexity in laser-treated specimens. CONCLUSION: Laser irradiation is an effective method for improving the bond strength in the repair of both milled and 3D-printed resin restorations. Particularly, 3D-printed resins showed superior repair bond strengths. Silane alone is insufficient; additional micromechanical surface treatments are required for reliable adhesion. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Mechanical complications can occur with milled and 3D-printed resin restorations, which are increasingly used in indirect restorations, and intraoral repair protocols are becoming a crucial consideration. Determining the most appropriate repair protocol and surface treatment is crucial for the successful repair of these new-generation resin restorations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70246
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Manufacturing Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Resin‐Based Restorations

Berkman ALBAYRAK, Sina Saygılı, Sarp Kocaer
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Manufacturing Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Resin‐Based Restorations

Berkman ALBAYRAK, Sina Saygılı, Sarp Kocaer
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of repaired milled and 3D-printed resin restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 84 resin specimens (8 mm diameter, 5 mm height) fabricated using two different methods such as milling (Grandio Disc) and 3D-printing (Saremco Crowntec) were subjected to three surface treatments: silane (control), air abrasion + silane, and laser irradiation + silane. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles each) before and after the repair protocol which was conducted with a flowable composite, and the shear bond strengths were measured. SEM images were obtained to evaluate the type of failures. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS V23, and two-way ANOVA analysis was used for comparisons between surface treatments and samples (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Laser irradiation yielded the highest bond strength (7.61 ± 1.94 MPa), showing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). The 3D-printed resin group exhibited significantly higher bond strengths after all surface treatments compared to the milled group (p = 0.028). Representative SEM observations revealed increased surface irregularity and fracture-surface complexity in laser-treated specimens. CONCLUSION: Laser irradiation is an effective method for improving the bond strength in the repair of both milled and 3D-printed resin restorations. Particularly, 3D-printed resins showed superior repair bond strengths. Silane alone is insufficient; additional micromechanical surface treatments are required for reliable adhesion. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Mechanical complications can occur with milled and 3D-printed resin restorations, which are increasingly used in indirect restorations, and intraoral repair protocols are becoming a crucial consideration. Determining the most appropriate repair protocol and surface treatment is crucial for the successful repair of these new-generation resin restorations.

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Bahçeşehir University (TR), Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.