Feasibility and Immunological Impact of Reusing Wild-Type C57BL/6 Mice in Systemic and Cutaneous Anaphylaxis Models 2309549

Abstract Introduction The reuse of laboratory animals across compatible immunological procedures offers a strategy to reduce animal numbers in line with the 3Rs principles. However, data on the physiological and immune effects of consecutive allergic or anaphylactic challenges remain limited. This study evaluated the feasibility and immunological impact of reusing C57BL/6 mice previously exposed to systemic anaphylaxis for a second moderate-severity challenge, either systemic or cutaneous. Methods Twenty-four 7-week-old male mice received an intravenous injection of compound 48/80 to induce systemic anaphylaxis (Run 1). Body temperature, hematological and cytokines were monitored at baseline, after Run 1, and on Day 5 before reuse. Seven days later (Run 2) mice underwent either a second systemic challenge or a cutaneous anaphylaxis via intradermal ear injection with mast cells agonists, combined with Evans Blue to monitor vascular permeability. Results During Run 1, transient hypothermia peaked 20—30 min post-induction, with full recovery within 80 min. In Run 2, the temperature drop was milder, and no mouse fell below 34 °C. Neutrophils transiently increased after Run 1 and returned to baseline, while lymphocytes showed the opposite trend. Cytokine concentrations increased after the first systemic challenge, returned to baseline and remained stable after the second exposure. Cutaneous responses and Evans Blue extravasation were comparable to single-use animals, confirming preserved immune and vascular responsiveness. No major modulation of other hematological parameters , and no behavioral distress were observed. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that mice can be safely reused for a second systemic or cutaneous anaphylaxis procedure after 5—7-days,with no exacerbation of immune or physiological responses, supporting ethical and scientific validity of controlled animal reuse in preclinical allergy research. Funding Source n/a Topic Categories Immediate Hypersensitivity, Asthma, and Allergic Responses (HYP)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jimmun/vkag141.1566
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and Immunological Impact of Reusing Wild-Type C57BL/6 Mice in Systemic and Cutaneous Anaphylaxis Models 2309549

Clément Costard, Emilie Mirey, André Colom, Yves Millet et al.
The Journal of Immunology
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Feasibility and Immunological Impact of Reusing Wild-Type C57BL/6 Mice in Systemic and Cutaneous Anaphylaxis Models 2309549

Clément Costard, Emilie Mirey, André Colom, Yves Millet, Frédéric Machet, Kévin Argilés
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The reuse of laboratory animals across compatible immunological procedures offers a strategy to reduce animal numbers in line with the 3Rs principles. However, data on the physiological and immune effects of consecutive allergic or anaphylactic challenges remain limited. This study evaluated the feasibility and immunological impact of reusing C57BL/6 mice previously exposed to systemic anaphylaxis for a second moderate-severity challenge, either systemic or cutaneous. Methods Twenty-four 7-week-old male mice received an intravenous injection of compound 48/80 to induce systemic anaphylaxis (Run 1). Body temperature, hematological and cytokines were monitored at baseline, after Run 1, and on Day 5 before reuse. Seven days later (Run 2) mice underwent either a second systemic challenge or a cutaneous anaphylaxis via intradermal ear injection with mast cells agonists, combined with Evans Blue to monitor vascular permeability. Results During Run 1, transient hypothermia peaked 20—30 min post-induction, with full recovery within 80 min. In Run 2, the temperature drop was milder, and no mouse fell below 34 °C. Neutrophils transiently increased after Run 1 and returned to baseline, while lymphocytes showed the opposite trend. Cytokine concentrations increased after the first systemic challenge, returned to baseline and remained stable after the second exposure. Cutaneous responses and Evans Blue extravasation were comparable to single-use animals, confirming preserved immune and vascular responsiveness. No major modulation of other hematological parameters , and no behavioral distress were observed. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that mice can be safely reused for a second systemic or cutaneous anaphylaxis procedure after 5—7-days,with no exacerbation of immune or physiological responses, supporting ethical and scientific validity of controlled animal reuse in preclinical allergy research. Funding Source n/a Topic Categories Immediate Hypersensitivity, Asthma, and Allergic Responses (HYP)

The Journal of ImmunologyVol. 215(Supplement_1)
Blueprint Medicines (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.