Soft‐Tissue Augmentation During Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone: Clinical, Radiographic, Histological and Patient‐Reported Outcomes From a Randomised Controlled Trial Using Connective Tissue Graft and a Volume‐Stable Collagen Matrix

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate the clinical, radiographic, histological and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) of soft‐tissue augmentation (STA) during implant placement in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft (CTG) or a volume‐stable collagen matrix (VCMX). Materials and Methods In this three‐arm randomised controlled trial, 25 patients were allocated to VCMX, SCTG, or no augmentation (control). Soft‐tissue thickness (STT) was assessed by ultrasonography, and buccal bone thickness (BBT) by CBCT, at baseline and 6 months. Clinical parameters, PROMs and histological findings were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed at the patient level using repeated‐measures general linear models, accounting for within‐subject variability. Results Both VCMX and SCTG resulted in significant increases in STT compared with control ( p < 0.001). Numerically greater STT gains were observed in the VCMX group. BBT decreased significantly over time in all groups, with no significant differences between treatments. PROMs were comparable, although CTG was associated with slightly higher morbidity. Histological analysis showed favourable integration of both grafting materials. Conclusion STA significantly increased STT but did not prevent buccal bone remodelling. Within the study limitations, both augmentation approaches were associated with increased STT compared with no augmentation. Further well‐designed studies are required to confirm these findings. Trial Registration This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06622759; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06622759 )

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70177
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soft‐Tissue Augmentation During Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone: Clinical, Radiographic, Histological and Patient‐Reported Outcomes From a Randomised Controlled Trial Using Connective Tissue Graft and a Volume‐Stable Collagen Matrix

Louiza Papantonatou, Leonidas Batas, Antigoni Delantoni, Eleutherios Anagnostou et al.
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Soft‐Tissue Augmentation During Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone: Clinical, Radiographic, Histological and Patient‐Reported Outcomes From a Randomised Controlled Trial Using Connective Tissue Graft and a Volume‐Stable Collagen Matrix

Louiza Papantonatou, Leonidas Batas, Antigoni Delantoni, Eleutherios Anagnostou, Ioannis Vouros
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate the clinical, radiographic, histological and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) of soft‐tissue augmentation (STA) during implant placement in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft (CTG) or a volume‐stable collagen matrix (VCMX). Materials and Methods In this three‐arm randomised controlled trial, 25 patients were allocated to VCMX, SCTG, or no augmentation (control). Soft‐tissue thickness (STT) was assessed by ultrasonography, and buccal bone thickness (BBT) by CBCT, at baseline and 6 months. Clinical parameters, PROMs and histological findings were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed at the patient level using repeated‐measures general linear models, accounting for within‐subject variability. Results Both VCMX and SCTG resulted in significant increases in STT compared with control ( p < 0.001). Numerically greater STT gains were observed in the VCMX group. BBT decreased significantly over time in all groups, with no significant differences between treatments. PROMs were comparable, although CTG was associated with slightly higher morbidity. Histological analysis showed favourable integration of both grafting materials. Conclusion STA significantly increased STT but did not prevent buccal bone remodelling. Within the study limitations, both augmentation approaches were associated with increased STT compared with no augmentation. Further well‐designed studies are required to confirm these findings. Trial Registration This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06622759; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06622759 )

Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.