Efficacy of in-house vs. third party resources on medical student NBME style exam performance 2309816

Abstract Introduction As lecture attendance declines in medical school, many students adopt third-party educational resources as primary study tools. This study aims to determine if scores on National Board of Medical Examiners exams differ between students who rely on third-party resources and students who primary rely on in-house lecture material for studying. Methods Data was collected anonymously via survey from students in the Classes of 2026 and 2027 at California Northstate University College of Medicine. The survey assessed students’ primary study resources for NBME-style examinations, comparing reliance on third-party learning tools vs in-house lecture materials. Given the foundational role of immunology across multiple preclinical organ system blocks, this analysis is relevant to understanding how medical students prepare for immunology content within integrated curricula. Students were categorized into two groups based on their reported primary resource: in-house lecture users and third-party resource users. Students indicating equal use of both resource types were classified as in-house lecture users. Participants reported final course grades, which were converted to numerical values (Honors = 3, High Pass = 2, Pass = 1, Fail = 0) and averaged across courses for each student. Results The average numerical grades for the in-house lecture group (n = 6) + equal use (n = 8) (total, n = 14) and the third-party group (n = 61) were 2.37 and 2.19, respectively. The two groups’ average grades were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test in R version 4.3.2. The in-house lecture group had significantly higher average grades than the third-party group (p < 0.001). Conclusion Data suggests that students primarily using in-house lecture material achieve higher scores on average, compared to those who primarily rely on third-party material for NBME style exams. Future multi-institutional studies are needed to explore the factors that influence a student’s decision to utilize third-party resources. Funding Source n/a Topic Categories Immunology Education and Communication (EDU)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jimmun/vkag141.1618
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of in-house vs. third party resources on medical student NBME style exam performance 2309816

H. A. Wolfson, Sarah Swerdlow, Hunter Hudgins, Lyndsey Hightower et al.
The Journal of Immunology
Innovations in Educational Methods
article

Efficacy of in-house vs. third party resources on medical student NBME style exam performance 2309816

H. A. Wolfson, Sarah Swerdlow, Hunter Hudgins, Lyndsey Hightower, Valerie Gerriets, John Cusick, Emma Hutchison
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction As lecture attendance declines in medical school, many students adopt third-party educational resources as primary study tools. This study aims to determine if scores on National Board of Medical Examiners exams differ between students who rely on third-party resources and students who primary rely on in-house lecture material for studying. Methods Data was collected anonymously via survey from students in the Classes of 2026 and 2027 at California Northstate University College of Medicine. The survey assessed students’ primary study resources for NBME-style examinations, comparing reliance on third-party learning tools vs in-house lecture materials. Given the foundational role of immunology across multiple preclinical organ system blocks, this analysis is relevant to understanding how medical students prepare for immunology content within integrated curricula. Students were categorized into two groups based on their reported primary resource: in-house lecture users and third-party resource users. Students indicating equal use of both resource types were classified as in-house lecture users. Participants reported final course grades, which were converted to numerical values (Honors = 3, High Pass = 2, Pass = 1, Fail = 0) and averaged across courses for each student. Results The average numerical grades for the in-house lecture group (n = 6) + equal use (n = 8) (total, n = 14) and the third-party group (n = 61) were 2.37 and 2.19, respectively. The two groups’ average grades were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test in R version 4.3.2. The in-house lecture group had significantly higher average grades than the third-party group (p < 0.001). Conclusion Data suggests that students primarily using in-house lecture material achieve higher scores on average, compared to those who primarily rely on third-party material for NBME style exams. Future multi-institutional studies are needed to explore the factors that influence a student’s decision to utilize third-party resources. Funding Source n/a Topic Categories Immunology Education and Communication (EDU)

The Journal of ImmunologyVol. 215(Supplement_1)
University of California, Merced (US), California Northstate University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Innovations in Educational Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.