Performance validation of mass spectrometry for detecting urinary Bence Jones protein and evaluation of its clinical application in multiple myeloma and amyloidosis

OBJECTIVES: Traditional urine immunofixation electrophoresis (uIFE) is cumbersome, has limited sensitivity, and is subjectively interpreted. This is especially problematic in renal impairment where accumulation of polyclonal free light chains may pseudonormalize the serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio, compromising its reliability for disease monitoring. This study aimed to validate two MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS)-based methods for urinary M-protein detection and to evaluate their clinical utility, particularly in addressing this limitation of sFLC ratio interpretation. METHODS: In 325 patients with multiple myeloma or amyloidosis, we compared two conventional uIFE methods (uIFE and uIFE-FLC) with two novel MALDI-TOF MS methods (iMS-IP Assay-urine and iMS-FLC Assay-urine). Patients were divided into a uIFE-positive cohort (164 cases) and a uIFE-negative cohort (161 cases). We evaluated the agreement between the novel methods and serological evidence (serum immunofixation electrophoresis [IFE] and sFLC), as well as their performance in challenging scenarios including renal impairment. RESULTS: The iMS-IP Assay-urine showed excellent agreement with uIFE (94.46 %, κ=0.877) and detected additional M-protein-positive cases that correlated with serum findings. The iMS-FLC Assay-urine showed moderate agreement with uIFE-FLC (80 %, κ=0.615) and detected significantly more positive cases, with support from serum assays. Notably, in six seronegative patients with renal impairment, iMS-FLC Assay-urine detected monoclonal free light chains in all cases, whereas uIFE-FLC detected only three. Both mass spectrometry methods also provided N-glycosylation information. CONCLUSIONS: The iMS-IP and iMS-FLC urine assays are sensitive, rapid, and objective, outperforming conventional uIFE. They offer critical complementary information, particularly in seronegative patients with renal impairment, supporting their potential to replace traditional urine immunofixation electrophoresis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0469
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance validation of mass spectrometry for detecting urinary Bence Jones protein and evaluation of its clinical application in multiple myeloma and amyloidosis

Ziliang Zhong, Yuxi Wang, Qiuling Ma, Chang Li et al.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Performance validation of mass spectrometry for detecting urinary Bence Jones protein and evaluation of its clinical application in multiple myeloma and amyloidosis

Ziliang Zhong, Yuxi Wang, Qiuling Ma, Chang Li, Haitao Meng, Yu Chen, Min Yang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Traditional urine immunofixation electrophoresis (uIFE) is cumbersome, has limited sensitivity, and is subjectively interpreted. This is especially problematic in renal impairment where accumulation of polyclonal free light chains may pseudonormalize the serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio, compromising its reliability for disease monitoring. This study aimed to validate two MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS)-based methods for urinary M-protein detection and to evaluate their clinical utility, particularly in addressing this limitation of sFLC ratio interpretation. METHODS: In 325 patients with multiple myeloma or amyloidosis, we compared two conventional uIFE methods (uIFE and uIFE-FLC) with two novel MALDI-TOF MS methods (iMS-IP Assay-urine and iMS-FLC Assay-urine). Patients were divided into a uIFE-positive cohort (164 cases) and a uIFE-negative cohort (161 cases). We evaluated the agreement between the novel methods and serological evidence (serum immunofixation electrophoresis [IFE] and sFLC), as well as their performance in challenging scenarios including renal impairment. RESULTS: The iMS-IP Assay-urine showed excellent agreement with uIFE (94.46 %, κ=0.877) and detected additional M-protein-positive cases that correlated with serum findings. The iMS-FLC Assay-urine showed moderate agreement with uIFE-FLC (80 %, κ=0.615) and detected significantly more positive cases, with support from serum assays. Notably, in six seronegative patients with renal impairment, iMS-FLC Assay-urine detected monoclonal free light chains in all cases, whereas uIFE-FLC detected only three. Both mass spectrometry methods also provided N-glycosylation information. CONCLUSIONS: The iMS-IP and iMS-FLC urine assays are sensitive, rapid, and objective, outperforming conventional uIFE. They offer critical complementary information, particularly in seronegative patients with renal impairment, supporting their potential to replace traditional urine immunofixation electrophoresis.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Qingdao Academy of Intelligent Industries (CN), Blood Center of Zhejiang Province (CN), Yebio Bioengineering (China) (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.