The magic of AI: Unveiling the sociopolitical implications of belief in artificial intelligence

This introduction argues that anthropology requires a new conceptual framework for understanding the contemporary social life of artificial intelligence (AI). We propose "the magic of AI" as an analytical concept that shifts attention from AI's technical capacities to the beliefs, uncertainties, and sociotechnical imaginaries through which it acquires authority and efficacy. Revisiting anthropological theories of magic, particularly the work of Ernesto De Martino, Bruce Kapferer, and Francesco Della Costa, we argue that AI's apparent autonomy functions less as a property of the technology itself than as a collectively sustained form of belief. These beliefs naturalize AI's purported inevitability, mobilize political and economic investments, and obscure the human labour, infrastructures, and relations of power through which AI is continually produced. Rather than employing magic as a metaphor, we develop it as a theoretical lens for analysing how opacity, trust, and anticipation generate material sociopolitical effects. In doing so, this introduction offers a conceptual framework for understanding AI as a contingent sociotechnical formation whose power rests as much in collective imagination as in computation itself, while introducing the contributions that develop this argument ethnographically across diverse settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anthropological Theory
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996261470781
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The magic of AI: Unveiling the sociopolitical implications of belief in artificial intelligence

Roanne van Voorst, Michiel Baas
Anthropological Theory
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The magic of AI: Unveiling the sociopolitical implications of belief in artificial intelligence

Roanne van Voorst, Michiel Baas
article en

Abstract

This introduction argues that anthropology requires a new conceptual framework for understanding the contemporary social life of artificial intelligence (AI). We propose "the magic of AI" as an analytical concept that shifts attention from AI's technical capacities to the beliefs, uncertainties, and sociotechnical imaginaries through which it acquires authority and efficacy. Revisiting anthropological theories of magic, particularly the work of Ernesto De Martino, Bruce Kapferer, and Francesco Della Costa, we argue that AI's apparent autonomy functions less as a property of the technology itself than as a collectively sustained form of belief. These beliefs naturalize AI's purported inevitability, mobilize political and economic investments, and obscure the human labour, infrastructures, and relations of power through which AI is continually produced. Rather than employing magic as a metaphor, we develop it as a theoretical lens for analysing how opacity, trust, and anticipation generate material sociopolitical effects. In doing so, this introduction offers a conceptual framework for understanding AI as a contingent sociotechnical formation whose power rests as much in collective imagination as in computation itself, while introducing the contributions that develop this argument ethnographically across diverse settings.

Anthropological Theory
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology (DE), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.