Normative Norwegian scores on the clock drawing test using the Shulman version

Background Studies have shown that the performance on the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is influenced by age and education. Thus, normative scores are needed. Objective To develop normative Norwegian scores for Shulman's version of CDT. Methods Performance on CDT of 2572 cognitively healthy people between age 25 and 95 years were included. Ordinal regression analysis was used to derive regression-based norms with sex, age and education as covariates. Results Of all, 76.4% scored five, 12.9% scored four, 8.1% scored three and 2.5% scored zero to two. Men scored higher than women. An interaction between age and education was found. The probability of higher CDT score is highest at younger ages and among those with highest education. It progressively declines with increasing age, while higher education delays, but does not prevent this decline. Participants scoring zero to two fell below the 5 th percentile, except among women above 93 years and men above 85 years. By age 95, the probability of different scores converged. In the age range of 60 to 90 years a score of three corresponded to percentiles of 3.7–26.9 in men and 5.2–34.1 in women, while a score of four corresponded to percentiles of 9.7–50.4 in men and 13.2–59.0 in women. Conclusions Scores four and five are considered normal for any person aged 60–90 years. Whether a score of three is normal depends on the person's sex, age and educational level, whereas score zero to two should not be regarded as normal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261471901
Primary Topic
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normative Norwegian scores on the clock drawing test using the Shulman version

Anne‐Brita Knapskog, Jørgen Wagle, Karin Persson, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
article

Normative Norwegian scores on the clock drawing test using the Shulman version

Anne‐Brita Knapskog, Jørgen Wagle, Karin Persson, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Knut Engedal
article en

Abstract

Background Studies have shown that the performance on the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is influenced by age and education. Thus, normative scores are needed. Objective To develop normative Norwegian scores for Shulman's version of CDT. Methods Performance on CDT of 2572 cognitively healthy people between age 25 and 95 years were included. Ordinal regression analysis was used to derive regression-based norms with sex, age and education as covariates. Results Of all, 76.4% scored five, 12.9% scored four, 8.1% scored three and 2.5% scored zero to two. Men scored higher than women. An interaction between age and education was found. The probability of higher CDT score is highest at younger ages and among those with highest education. It progressively declines with increasing age, while higher education delays, but does not prevent this decline. Participants scoring zero to two fell below the 5 th percentile, except among women above 93 years and men above 85 years. By age 95, the probability of different scores converged. In the age range of 60 to 90 years a score of three corresponded to percentiles of 3.7–26.9 in men and 5.2–34.1 in women, while a score of four corresponded to percentiles of 9.7–50.4 in men and 13.2–59.0 in women. Conclusions Scores four and five are considered normal for any person aged 60–90 years. Whether a score of three is normal depends on the person's sex, age and educational level, whereas score zero to two should not be regarded as normal.

Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Akershus University Hospital (NO), Sykehuset i Vestfold (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.