The Effect of Spatial Distance on the Moral Judgment of Environmental Wrongdoings

Abstract: We conducted a direct replication of Grolleau et al.’s (2023) France-based experiment ( N = 182), which found that higher spatial distance between a decision-maker and the environmental wrongdoing led to harsher moral judgments by third parties. In our German-speaking sample ( N = 280), we found minimal support for the original findings, with effect sizes substantially smaller than the original study. As an extension, we examined nature relatedness as a moderator and construal level as mediator – one of the mechanisms proposed but not assessed by the original authors. Construal level did not correlate with moral judgments, and nature relatedness showed no moderating effect. We discuss potential explanations for this replication failure relating to materials, measurements, and theoretical assumptions underlying the original hypothesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000597
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Spatial Distance on the Moral Judgment of Environmental Wrongdoings

Christina Sagioglou, Jeremy N. Irilli, Anna Mayer
Social Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

The Effect of Spatial Distance on the Moral Judgment of Environmental Wrongdoings

Christina Sagioglou, Jeremy N. Irilli, Anna Mayer
article en

Abstract

Abstract: We conducted a direct replication of Grolleau et al.’s (2023) France-based experiment ( N = 182), which found that higher spatial distance between a decision-maker and the environmental wrongdoing led to harsher moral judgments by third parties. In our German-speaking sample ( N = 280), we found minimal support for the original findings, with effect sizes substantially smaller than the original study. As an extension, we examined nature relatedness as a moderator and construal level as mediator – one of the mechanisms proposed but not assessed by the original authors. Construal level did not correlate with moral judgments, and nature relatedness showed no moderating effect. We discuss potential explanations for this replication failure relating to materials, measurements, and theoretical assumptions underlying the original hypothesis.

Social Psychology
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.