Demand Networks and Informal Volunteering

Patterns of volunteering have predominantly been explained by focusing on the supply side in terms of volunteers' resources and motivations. We shift the focus to the demand side of volunteering and develop the concept of demand networks. We argue that experienced demand for help in one's personal network is important to explain why individuals engage in informally organized voluntary help and support: the amount of demand for help a person experiences in their network influences the likelihood that the person helps. To explain why individuals who perceive similar levels of demand do not all volunteer to the same extent, we theorize how demand networks are mediated by the institutional factors of social values and gender roles. We hypothesize that altruistic values and gendered social roles dispose individuals to respond differently to demands for help, with women and those holding stronger altruistic values being more likely to act on the needs they perceive. We examine the hypotheses using a cross-sectional survey inquiring about informally organized volunteering during COVID-19. The results clearly indicate the importance of the demand side to adequately explain informal volunteering. We argue that our findings imply that sociologists should reconceptualise social connections not only as providing access to resources but also as a source of demands on individuals. In doing so attention should be paid to gender roles which the results suggest function as an amplifier of demand networks association with informal volunteering. We further discuss how the results have implications for building social capital and societal resilience in times of crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Sociology
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70151
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demand Networks and Informal Volunteering

Hjalmar Bang Carlsen, Jonas Toubøl
British Journal of Sociology
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Demand Networks and Informal Volunteering

Hjalmar Bang Carlsen, Jonas Toubøl
article en

Abstract

Patterns of volunteering have predominantly been explained by focusing on the supply side in terms of volunteers' resources and motivations. We shift the focus to the demand side of volunteering and develop the concept of demand networks. We argue that experienced demand for help in one's personal network is important to explain why individuals engage in informally organized voluntary help and support: the amount of demand for help a person experiences in their network influences the likelihood that the person helps. To explain why individuals who perceive similar levels of demand do not all volunteer to the same extent, we theorize how demand networks are mediated by the institutional factors of social values and gender roles. We hypothesize that altruistic values and gendered social roles dispose individuals to respond differently to demands for help, with women and those holding stronger altruistic values being more likely to act on the needs they perceive. We examine the hypotheses using a cross-sectional survey inquiring about informally organized volunteering during COVID-19. The results clearly indicate the importance of the demand side to adequately explain informal volunteering. We argue that our findings imply that sociologists should reconceptualise social connections not only as providing access to resources but also as a source of demands on individuals. In doing so attention should be paid to gender roles which the results suggest function as an amplifier of demand networks association with informal volunteering. We further discuss how the results have implications for building social capital and societal resilience in times of crisis.

British Journal of Sociology
University of Copenhagen (DK), University College Copenhagen (DK), Danish National Centre for Social Research (DK)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.