Hybrid photovoltaic power forecasting by combining physical and machine learning models

Hybrid models integrating physical and machine learning (ML) techniques demonstrate strong potential for photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting. This manuscript provides a comprehensive analysis of hybrid models for deterministic and probabilistic day-ahead PV forecasting. Two hybrid approaches are implemented: physics-informed ML, which relies primarily on the ML model, and physics-guided models, primarily driven by the physical approach. Different physical and ML models, from classical to more detailed formulations, are used to study whether increasing physical and ML complexity affects the final performance of hybrid models. Results indicate that the ML model is the most influential factor in final forecasting accuracy, with nonlinear (especially ensemble) methods achieving the best results. In contrast, hybrid models’ performance is weakly sensitive to physical model refinements and to the hybridization approach, which affects the final metrics by less than 1%. To validate the results, data from PV systems in Brazil and the Netherlands are used, representing different climate conditions and installation types. Comparative tests confirm that the synergy between physical and ML improves accuracy and robustness, offering a reliable solution for PV forecasting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar Energy
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2026.114951
Primary Topic
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid photovoltaic power forecasting by combining physical and machine learning models

Paulo César Marques de Carvalho, Tarek AlSkaif, Letícia de Oliveira Santos
Solar Energy
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
article

Hybrid photovoltaic power forecasting by combining physical and machine learning models

Paulo César Marques de Carvalho, Tarek AlSkaif, Letícia de Oliveira Santos
article en

Abstract

Hybrid models integrating physical and machine learning (ML) techniques demonstrate strong potential for photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting. This manuscript provides a comprehensive analysis of hybrid models for deterministic and probabilistic day-ahead PV forecasting. Two hybrid approaches are implemented: physics-informed ML, which relies primarily on the ML model, and physics-guided models, primarily driven by the physical approach. Different physical and ML models, from classical to more detailed formulations, are used to study whether increasing physical and ML complexity affects the final performance of hybrid models. Results indicate that the ML model is the most influential factor in final forecasting accuracy, with nonlinear (especially ensemble) methods achieving the best results. In contrast, hybrid models’ performance is weakly sensitive to physical model refinements and to the hybridization approach, which affects the final metrics by less than 1%. To validate the results, data from PV systems in Brazil and the Netherlands are used, representing different climate conditions and installation types. Comparative tests confirm that the synergy between physical and ML improves accuracy and robustness, offering a reliable solution for PV forecasting.

Solar EnergyVol. 317
Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Wageningen University and Research Centre, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.