Fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine

Abstract Aim Hardly any evidence exists on fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine. Thus, we investigated the factors associated with such fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine. Subject and methods Data were used from a representative sample of German adults (sample consisted of 2591 individuals, averaging around 47 years). We developed a scale to quantify fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine (called FFDAIM-G). Norm values were presented, and multiple linear regressions were performed. Results On a scale from 1 to 7, the mean level of fear regarding the future development of AI in medicine (i.e., FFDAIM-G) was 4.3 (SD 1.5). The reference values significantly differed between certain sociodemographic groups (e.g., depending on age group). The FFDAIM-G had favorable psychometric properties. Regressions showed that higher fear levels regarding the future development of AI in medicine were significantly associated with being female (compared to being male, β = .20, p < .01), a higher number of chronic conditions ( β = .10, p < .001), and poorer self-rated health ( β = −.12, p < .01). Conclusion Overall, some fears already exist regarding the future development of AI in medicine, depending on the sociodemographic group. Women and individuals with poor health are susceptible to such fears. This study can be seen as a basis for researching fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine and may thus guide upcoming studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-026-02869-y
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine

André Hajek, Hans-Helmut König
Journal of Public Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine

André Hajek, Hans-Helmut König
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim Hardly any evidence exists on fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine. Thus, we investigated the factors associated with such fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine. Subject and methods Data were used from a representative sample of German adults (sample consisted of 2591 individuals, averaging around 47 years). We developed a scale to quantify fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine (called FFDAIM-G). Norm values were presented, and multiple linear regressions were performed. Results On a scale from 1 to 7, the mean level of fear regarding the future development of AI in medicine (i.e., FFDAIM-G) was 4.3 (SD 1.5). The reference values significantly differed between certain sociodemographic groups (e.g., depending on age group). The FFDAIM-G had favorable psychometric properties. Regressions showed that higher fear levels regarding the future development of AI in medicine were significantly associated with being female (compared to being male, β = .20, p < .01), a higher number of chronic conditions ( β = .10, p < .001), and poorer self-rated health ( β = −.12, p < .01). Conclusion Overall, some fears already exist regarding the future development of AI in medicine, depending on the sociodemographic group. Women and individuals with poor health are susceptible to such fears. This study can be seen as a basis for researching fears regarding the future development of AI in medicine and may thus guide upcoming studies.

Journal of Public Health
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.