Communication Training for Medical Residents: A Mixed-Methods OSCE Pilot of CONVERSA LATAM

Objectives Serious-illness communication training is well established in North America and Europe but few culturally adapted programmes have been formally evaluated in Latin America. We evaluated behavioural change and perceived shifts in practice following Core CONVERSA LATAM, a short regionally adapted curriculum delivered to first-year residents in Chile. Methods Single-group convergent mixed-methods pilot at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Nine first-year residents in oncology and geriatrics completed pre- and post-course Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) with two scenarios (a patient expressing mistrust; a family member hoping for a miracle), framed by a 7.5-hour course. Performance was scored on an eight-domain instrument adapted from the Gap-Kalamazoo assessment by self, standardized patients and faculty. The qualitative strand comprised 108 written feedback and self-reflection entries, analysed by reflexive thematic analysis. Strands were integrated through a joint display. Results Nine residents (4 women, 5 men) completed the curriculum. Total OSCE scores improved across rater types: self (mean change 25.6, 95% CI 19.4-31.7), standardized patient (22.7, 14.6-30.7) and faculty (42.3, 31.8-52.9), all P <.01; as an exploratory pilot, these comparisons were not corrected for multiple testing. Variability between residents narrowed at post-test, suggesting convergence toward a shared baseline. Five qualitative themes traced a shift from information-heavy to deliberate, patient-centred practice: responding to emotions; responding to mistrust; integrating values and beliefs; delivering prognosis; and making recommendations rooted in patients’ goals. Conclusions A short, culturally adapted, OSCE-anchored curriculum produced measurable behavioural change and perceived shifts in practice, with consistent gains across three independent raters and a parallel qualitative trajectory. Mixed-methods OSCE evaluation offers a feasible model for serious-illness communication training in settings where formal training is still emerging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261471067
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communication Training for Medical Residents: A Mixed-Methods OSCE Pilot of CONVERSA LATAM

Philip Garrity, Ofelia Leiva-Vásquez, Bethany‐Rose Daubman, Carolina Jaña et al.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Communication Training for Medical Residents: A Mixed-Methods OSCE Pilot of CONVERSA LATAM

Philip Garrity, Ofelia Leiva-Vásquez, Bethany‐Rose Daubman, Carolina Jaña, Joaquin Palacios, Mark Stoltenberg, Daniel N. Forte, Zhimeng Jia
article en

Abstract

Objectives Serious-illness communication training is well established in North America and Europe but few culturally adapted programmes have been formally evaluated in Latin America. We evaluated behavioural change and perceived shifts in practice following Core CONVERSA LATAM, a short regionally adapted curriculum delivered to first-year residents in Chile. Methods Single-group convergent mixed-methods pilot at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Nine first-year residents in oncology and geriatrics completed pre- and post-course Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) with two scenarios (a patient expressing mistrust; a family member hoping for a miracle), framed by a 7.5-hour course. Performance was scored on an eight-domain instrument adapted from the Gap-Kalamazoo assessment by self, standardized patients and faculty. The qualitative strand comprised 108 written feedback and self-reflection entries, analysed by reflexive thematic analysis. Strands were integrated through a joint display. Results Nine residents (4 women, 5 men) completed the curriculum. Total OSCE scores improved across rater types: self (mean change 25.6, 95% CI 19.4-31.7), standardized patient (22.7, 14.6-30.7) and faculty (42.3, 31.8-52.9), all P <.01; as an exploratory pilot, these comparisons were not corrected for multiple testing. Variability between residents narrowed at post-test, suggesting convergence toward a shared baseline. Five qualitative themes traced a shift from information-heavy to deliberate, patient-centred practice: responding to emotions; responding to mistrust; integrating values and beliefs; delivering prognosis; and making recommendations rooted in patients’ goals. Conclusions A short, culturally adapted, OSCE-anchored curriculum produced measurable behavioural change and perceived shifts in practice, with consistent gains across three independent raters and a parallel qualitative trajectory. Mixed-methods OSCE evaluation offers a feasible model for serious-illness communication training in settings where formal training is still emerging.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Toronto (CA), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Sinai Health System (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.