Relative Bioavailability of Once-Daily Clonidine XR Oral Suspension Versus Twice-Daily XR Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

Purpose: To assess the bioequivalence of once-daily clonidine extended-release (XR) oral suspension (OS) to twice-daily clonidine XR tablets (TABs), which are approved for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: Study 1 ( n = 20) evaluated an equivalent daily dose of clonidine XR OS versus TABs and clonidine XR OS under fed versus fasted conditions. Outcomes included the maximum plasma concentration (C max ), the area under the analyte versus time curve (AUC) from 0 to the last analyte concentration (AUC t ) and to infinity (AUC inf ), and the half-life (T half ). Study 2 ( n = 19) evaluated AUC, C max , and the minimum concentration (C min ) at steady state (SS). The ratios of geometric means and corresponding 90% CIs of pharmacokinetic parameters for each treatment were compared to the US Food and Drug Administration definition of bioequivalence (80%–125%). Results: In Study 1 (mean [ SD ] age, 42 [11] years; 30% female; 10% Asian, 25% Black or African American, 5% Multiracial, 60% White; 40% Hispanic or Latino), the ratios (90% CIs) of clonidine XR OS to TABs were within the bioequivalence range accepted by the FDA for C max (95.6 [89.8, 101.8]), AUC t (97.2 [91.6, 103.1]) and AUC inf (96.1 [89.4, 103.4]); similar results were observed for clonidine XR OS under fed versus fasting conditions. The median (range) T half was 12.8 (8–24) hours. In study 2 (mean [ SD ] age, 43 [11] years; 42% female; 47% Asian, 26% Black or African American, 0% Multiracial, 26% White; 0% Hispanic or Latino), AUC t,ss and C max,ss were both within the acceptable range (97.7 [93.4, 102.1] and 107.9 [103.8, 112.2], respectively). The C min,ss for clonidine XR OS was ~26% lower than clonidine XR TABs (74.0 [69.3, 79.0]) but this difference was not considered clinically meaningful by the FDA. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that clonidine XR OS is bioequivalent to clonidine XR TABs and could fulfill a treatment gap as a liquid, once-daily, non-stimulant ADHD treatment option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547261463433
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relative Bioavailability of Once-Daily Clonidine XR Oral Suspension Versus Twice-Daily XR Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

Rakesh Jain, Joseph C. Grieco, Eman Rafla, Matthew Witkovic et al.
Journal of Attention Disorders
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
article

Relative Bioavailability of Once-Daily Clonidine XR Oral Suspension Versus Twice-Daily XR Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

Rakesh Jain, Joseph C. Grieco, Eman Rafla, Matthew Witkovic, Jim Potenziano, Jennifer Horng
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the bioequivalence of once-daily clonidine extended-release (XR) oral suspension (OS) to twice-daily clonidine XR tablets (TABs), which are approved for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: Study 1 ( n = 20) evaluated an equivalent daily dose of clonidine XR OS versus TABs and clonidine XR OS under fed versus fasted conditions. Outcomes included the maximum plasma concentration (C max ), the area under the analyte versus time curve (AUC) from 0 to the last analyte concentration (AUC t ) and to infinity (AUC inf ), and the half-life (T half ). Study 2 ( n = 19) evaluated AUC, C max , and the minimum concentration (C min ) at steady state (SS). The ratios of geometric means and corresponding 90% CIs of pharmacokinetic parameters for each treatment were compared to the US Food and Drug Administration definition of bioequivalence (80%–125%). Results: In Study 1 (mean [ SD ] age, 42 [11] years; 30% female; 10% Asian, 25% Black or African American, 5% Multiracial, 60% White; 40% Hispanic or Latino), the ratios (90% CIs) of clonidine XR OS to TABs were within the bioequivalence range accepted by the FDA for C max (95.6 [89.8, 101.8]), AUC t (97.2 [91.6, 103.1]) and AUC inf (96.1 [89.4, 103.4]); similar results were observed for clonidine XR OS under fed versus fasting conditions. The median (range) T half was 12.8 (8–24) hours. In study 2 (mean [ SD ] age, 43 [11] years; 42% female; 47% Asian, 26% Black or African American, 0% Multiracial, 26% White; 0% Hispanic or Latino), AUC t,ss and C max,ss were both within the acceptable range (97.7 [93.4, 102.1] and 107.9 [103.8, 112.2], respectively). The C min,ss for clonidine XR OS was ~26% lower than clonidine XR TABs (74.0 [69.3, 79.0]) but this difference was not considered clinically meaningful by the FDA. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that clonidine XR OS is bioequivalent to clonidine XR TABs and could fulfill a treatment gap as a liquid, once-daily, non-stimulant ADHD treatment option.

Journal of Attention Disorders
The University of Texas of the Permian Basin (US), Texas Tech University (US), Tris Pharma (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.