The Role of Carbon Accounting, Digital Transformation, Global Uncertainty, and Energy Efficiency in Improving Financial Decision-Making and Supporting Sustainability in High-Emission Industries

This study aimed to examine the integrated effects of Carbon Accounting (CA), Digital Transformation (DT), Energy Efficiency (EE), and Global Uncertainty (GU) on enhancing Financial Decision-Making Quality (FDMQ) and improving Sustainability Performance (SP) in high-emission industrial companies. Drawing on Dynamic Capabilities Theory, the study proposed that these practices represent interconnected organizational capabilities that enhance firms’ adaptive capacity and their ability to create sustainable value, while Global Uncertainty represents a contextual factor that may influence the effectiveness of these capabilities. The study adopted a quantitative longitudinal research design using Panel Data Analysis based on secondary data obtained from annual financial reports, sustainability reports, and corporate disclosures of industrial companies listed on the Palestine Exchange. The sample consisted of ten industrial companies observed over the period 2020–2025, resulting in 59 firm-year observations. The Fixed Effects Model was employed to examine the direct relationships among the study variables, complemented by mediation and moderation analyses to investigate the mediating role of Financial Decision-Making Quality and the moderating effect of Global Uncertainty. The empirical findings revealed that Carbon Accounting, Digital Transformation, and Energy Efficiency positively affect Financial Decision-Making Quality, indicating that firms with more advanced environmental accounting systems, stronger digital capabilities, and higher operational efficiency are better positioned to make effective financial decisions. Furthermore, these organizational capabilities were found to have direct positive effects on Sustainability Performance. In contrast, Global Uncertainty was found to negatively affect both Financial Decision-Making Quality and Sustainability Performance, while also weakening the positive effects of organizational capabilities on financial decision-making. The results further confirmed that Financial Decision-Making Quality plays a significant mediating role in the relationship between organizational capabilities and Sustainability Performance. Overall, the findings support the assumptions of Dynamic Capabilities Theory by demonstrating that achieving sustainability in high-emission industries requires the integration of environmental, digital, and financial capabilities within a coordinated organizational system rather than treating them as isolated practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18157615
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Carbon Accounting, Digital Transformation, Global Uncertainty, and Energy Efficiency in Improving Financial Decision-Making and Supporting Sustainability in High-Emission Industries

Ayşem İyikal Çelebi, Mohammad Omran Mustafa Abuafifeh
Sustainability
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The Role of Carbon Accounting, Digital Transformation, Global Uncertainty, and Energy Efficiency in Improving Financial Decision-Making and Supporting Sustainability in High-Emission Industries

Ayşem İyikal Çelebi, Mohammad Omran Mustafa Abuafifeh
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the integrated effects of Carbon Accounting (CA), Digital Transformation (DT), Energy Efficiency (EE), and Global Uncertainty (GU) on enhancing Financial Decision-Making Quality (FDMQ) and improving Sustainability Performance (SP) in high-emission industrial companies. Drawing on Dynamic Capabilities Theory, the study proposed that these practices represent interconnected organizational capabilities that enhance firms’ adaptive capacity and their ability to create sustainable value, while Global Uncertainty represents a contextual factor that may influence the effectiveness of these capabilities. The study adopted a quantitative longitudinal research design using Panel Data Analysis based on secondary data obtained from annual financial reports, sustainability reports, and corporate disclosures of industrial companies listed on the Palestine Exchange. The sample consisted of ten industrial companies observed over the period 2020–2025, resulting in 59 firm-year observations. The Fixed Effects Model was employed to examine the direct relationships among the study variables, complemented by mediation and moderation analyses to investigate the mediating role of Financial Decision-Making Quality and the moderating effect of Global Uncertainty. The empirical findings revealed that Carbon Accounting, Digital Transformation, and Energy Efficiency positively affect Financial Decision-Making Quality, indicating that firms with more advanced environmental accounting systems, stronger digital capabilities, and higher operational efficiency are better positioned to make effective financial decisions. Furthermore, these organizational capabilities were found to have direct positive effects on Sustainability Performance. In contrast, Global Uncertainty was found to negatively affect both Financial Decision-Making Quality and Sustainability Performance, while also weakening the positive effects of organizational capabilities on financial decision-making. The results further confirmed that Financial Decision-Making Quality plays a significant mediating role in the relationship between organizational capabilities and Sustainability Performance. Overall, the findings support the assumptions of Dynamic Capabilities Theory by demonstrating that achieving sustainability in high-emission industries requires the integration of environmental, digital, and financial capabilities within a coordinated organizational system rather than treating them as isolated practices.

SustainabilityVol. 18(15)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.