The Chains That Bind? Restrictive Covenants and Labor Market Entrants' Perceived Occupational Mobility

ABSTRACT Using a conjoint experiment on highly educated labor market entrants in the Philippines, we examine how restrictive covenants shape perceived occupational mobility. Respondents compared hypothetical jobseeker profiles with randomized non‐compete, training repayment, and non‐solicitation clauses, then chose the likely applicant to four mobility pathways: vertical or lateral jobs within or across industries. Findings show that non‐compete clauses deter within‐industry and encourage across‐industry perceived mobility. Training repayment and non‐solicitation clauses exert targeted effects depending on scope conditions. Finally, these patterns hold across contractual breadth and firms' monitoring stringency, and are attenuated by positive beliefs about loyalty norms and perceived sufficiency of legal recourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.70037
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Chains That Bind? Restrictive Covenants and Labor Market Entrants' Perceived Occupational Mobility

Vincent Jerald Ramos, Benjamin Radoc
Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

The Chains That Bind? Restrictive Covenants and Labor Market Entrants' Perceived Occupational Mobility

Vincent Jerald Ramos, Benjamin Radoc
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using a conjoint experiment on highly educated labor market entrants in the Philippines, we examine how restrictive covenants shape perceived occupational mobility. Respondents compared hypothetical jobseeker profiles with randomized non‐compete, training repayment, and non‐solicitation clauses, then chose the likely applicant to four mobility pathways: vertical or lateral jobs within or across industries. Findings show that non‐compete clauses deter within‐industry and encourage across‐industry perceived mobility. Training repayment and non‐solicitation clauses exert targeted effects depending on scope conditions. Finally, these patterns hold across contractual breadth and firms' monitoring stringency, and are attenuated by positive beliefs about loyalty norms and perceived sufficiency of legal recourse.

Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society
Ateneo de Manila University (PH), University of Southampton (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, University of the Philippines, Economic and Social Research Council
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Chains That Bind? Restrictive Covenants and Labor Market Entrants' Perceived Occupational Mobility — Vincent Jerald Ramos, Benjamin Radoc · Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS