Non-motor Outcomes After Stroke: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Adverse non-motor outcomes are common after stroke, yet their true prevalence and prognosis remain uncertain, partly due to substantial methodological heterogeneity across studies. We aim to undertake a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on adverse non-motor outcomes after stroke. First, we aim to examine prevalence across study settings (hospital-based versus population-based cohorts) and to evaluate the influence of outcome definitions, measurement instruments (validated versus non-validated), stroke type (ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage, or mixed), and duration of follow-up. Second, we aim to identify study-level characteristics associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO via Ovid (1st January 1999 - 30th November 2025) for prospective cohorts reporting 11 non-motor outcomes: anxiety, depression, apathy, fatigue, sleep disturbance, social participation, pain, bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. Pooled prevalence according to study setting (hospital versus population) was estimated using random-effects models; outcome definitions and measures were synthesised using descriptive statistics, and meta-regression analysis was used to identify associated factors. The quality of all included studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: A total of 357 prospective cohort studies, (247 541 participants; mean age 64 years; 247 male-predominant studies) were included, with a follow-up between 30 days to 10 years after stroke with median follow-up 6 months [IQR 3-12]. Half of the studies were hospital based 181/352 (51%). Of the included studies, 195 (55%) included participants with ischaemic stroke, 148 (42%) included participants with ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage, while only 10 (3%) included participants with intracerebral haemorrhage. Across all analysis heterogeneity ranged I2 41%-99%. We found no significant differences in the prevalence of adverse non-motor outcomes between hospital versus population settings, except, bowel dysfunction was more frequently reported in population-based studies (61%, 95% Cl 54%-67% vs 47%, 95% Cl 37%-58%, p=0.005). Non-validated outcome measures were used in 156/352 studies (44.3%). Studies using non-validated outcome measures showed higher pooled prevalence of anxiety (34%, 95% Cl 29%-40%, vs 25%, 95% Cl 20%-33%, p<0.001), apathy (32%, 95% Cl 27%-36, vs 22%, 95% 13%-41%, p=0.005), sleep disturbance (62%, 95% Cl 54%-73%, vs 51%, 95% Cl 44%-58%, p<0.001), and bowel dysfunction (56%, 95% Cl 43%-69% vs. 49%, 95% Cl 38%-60%, p=0.027). Majority of studies 207/352 (59%), were conducted within 30 days to 6 months after stroke, whereas only 41/352 (12%) examined non-motor outcomes beyond 2 years post-stroke. Older age (>60 years), stroke due to ICH, and use of non-validated outcome measures were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of adverse non-motor outcomes across multiple domains. CONCLUSIONS: Non-motor outcomes are highly prevalent after stroke in hospital and population settings. However, we found methodological limitations across included studies, including limited evidence on non-motor outcomes after ICH, poor characterisation of stroke type, frequent use of non-validated outcome measures, and few studies assessing outcomes beyond two years after stroke. Our findings indicate an urgent need for long-term, methodologically rigorous studies of non-motor outcomes after stroke to enable consistent assessment, inform life after stroke pathways, and improve clinical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Stroke
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930261475966
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-motor Outcomes After Stroke: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hatice Özkan, Avril Drummond, Taniya Esmail, Alexander Leff et al.
International Journal of Stroke
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Non-motor Outcomes After Stroke: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hatice Özkan, Avril Drummond, Taniya Esmail, Alexander Leff, David John Werring, G Ambler, Robert Simister
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse non-motor outcomes are common after stroke, yet their true prevalence and prognosis remain uncertain, partly due to substantial methodological heterogeneity across studies. We aim to undertake a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on adverse non-motor outcomes after stroke. First, we aim to examine prevalence across study settings (hospital-based versus population-based cohorts) and to evaluate the influence of outcome definitions, measurement instruments (validated versus non-validated), stroke type (ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage, or mixed), and duration of follow-up. Second, we aim to identify study-level characteristics associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO via Ovid (1st January 1999 - 30th November 2025) for prospective cohorts reporting 11 non-motor outcomes: anxiety, depression, apathy, fatigue, sleep disturbance, social participation, pain, bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. Pooled prevalence according to study setting (hospital versus population) was estimated using random-effects models; outcome definitions and measures were synthesised using descriptive statistics, and meta-regression analysis was used to identify associated factors. The quality of all included studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: A total of 357 prospective cohort studies, (247 541 participants; mean age 64 years; 247 male-predominant studies) were included, with a follow-up between 30 days to 10 years after stroke with median follow-up 6 months [IQR 3-12]. Half of the studies were hospital based 181/352 (51%). Of the included studies, 195 (55%) included participants with ischaemic stroke, 148 (42%) included participants with ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage, while only 10 (3%) included participants with intracerebral haemorrhage. Across all analysis heterogeneity ranged I2 41%-99%. We found no significant differences in the prevalence of adverse non-motor outcomes between hospital versus population settings, except, bowel dysfunction was more frequently reported in population-based studies (61%, 95% Cl 54%-67% vs 47%, 95% Cl 37%-58%, p=0.005). Non-validated outcome measures were used in 156/352 studies (44.3%). Studies using non-validated outcome measures showed higher pooled prevalence of anxiety (34%, 95% Cl 29%-40%, vs 25%, 95% Cl 20%-33%, p<0.001), apathy (32%, 95% Cl 27%-36, vs 22%, 95% 13%-41%, p=0.005), sleep disturbance (62%, 95% Cl 54%-73%, vs 51%, 95% Cl 44%-58%, p<0.001), and bowel dysfunction (56%, 95% Cl 43%-69% vs. 49%, 95% Cl 38%-60%, p=0.027). Majority of studies 207/352 (59%), were conducted within 30 days to 6 months after stroke, whereas only 41/352 (12%) examined non-motor outcomes beyond 2 years post-stroke. Older age (>60 years), stroke due to ICH, and use of non-validated outcome measures were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of adverse non-motor outcomes across multiple domains. CONCLUSIONS: Non-motor outcomes are highly prevalent after stroke in hospital and population settings. However, we found methodological limitations across included studies, including limited evidence on non-motor outcomes after ICH, poor characterisation of stroke type, frequent use of non-validated outcome measures, and few studies assessing outcomes beyond two years after stroke. Our findings indicate an urgent need for long-term, methodologically rigorous studies of non-motor outcomes after stroke to enable consistent assessment, inform life after stroke pathways, and improve clinical care.

International Journal of Stroke
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Loughborough University (GB), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB), University College London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.