Procedural Change in the Danish Parliament, 1850–2025

ABSTRACT There is much recent interest in the politics of procedural change in European legislatures. In this article, we advance existing research by examining the evolution of legislative procedures in the Danish parliament. Our contribution is threefold. First, we introduce a novel, complete and machine‐readable dataset of all rules of procedure of the Folketing between 1850 and 2025, creating a free resource for scholars of parliamentary politics. Second, we use the new data to explore patterns of procedural change in the Folketing, revealing a sharp increase in parliamentary regulation alongside elements of continuity. Third, we provide two illustrative applications of our data: revisiting the measurement of agenda‐setting powers in the Folketing and examining the impact of constitutional revisions on the dynamics of procedural change. Taken together, our data and analysis deepen understanding of legislative developments in Denmark and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Political Studies
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.70055
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procedural Change in the Danish Parliament, 1850–2025

Peter Heyn Nielsen, Radosław Zubek
Scandinavian Political Studies
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Procedural Change in the Danish Parliament, 1850–2025

Peter Heyn Nielsen, Radosław Zubek
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is much recent interest in the politics of procedural change in European legislatures. In this article, we advance existing research by examining the evolution of legislative procedures in the Danish parliament. Our contribution is threefold. First, we introduce a novel, complete and machine‐readable dataset of all rules of procedure of the Folketing between 1850 and 2025, creating a free resource for scholars of parliamentary politics. Second, we use the new data to explore patterns of procedural change in the Folketing, revealing a sharp increase in parliamentary regulation alongside elements of continuity. Third, we provide two illustrative applications of our data: revisiting the measurement of agenda‐setting powers in the Folketing and examining the impact of constitutional revisions on the dynamics of procedural change. Taken together, our data and analysis deepen understanding of legislative developments in Denmark and beyond.

Scandinavian Political StudiesVol. 49(3)
Roskilde University (DK), University of Oxford (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Procedural Change in the Danish Parliament, 1850–2025 — Peter Heyn Nielsen, Radosław Zubek · Scandinavian Political Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS