Pedicle morphometry of the lumbar spine in a sample of the Mexican population, measured by computed tomography

Background:The greatest purchase of a screw in the lumbar spine occurs in the pedicle.This makes it important to have the largest diameter possible without damaging its walls.Objective: The aim of the study was to determine lumbar pedicle parameters in a population sample from Mexico City, to properly select the screw for use in lumbar spine surgery.Material and methods: Sixty patients, aged 20-70 years, were evaluated.Computed tomography (CT) scans measured the internal and external cortical pedicle height, internal and external cortical pedicle width, and the convergence angle in each lumbar pedicle.Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine the difference between means by sex and segment.Results: The mean age was 51.7 and 49.7 years in men and women, respectively.In women, the internal cortical pedicle width was smaller from L1 to L4, and the internal cortical pedicle height was smaller at L5.In men, the inner cortical pedicle width was narrower from L1 to L3, and the inner cortical pedicle height was narrower at L4 and L5.The angle of convergence was narrower at L1 and gradually increased up to L5 in both men and women.Conclusions: In women, 5.0 mm screws are safe for L4 and L5, and 4.0 mm screws are safe for L1-L3.In men, 5.0 mm screws are safe for L1 and L2, and 5.5 mm screws are safe for L3.At L4 and L5, 5.5 mm screws are safe.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anales Médicos de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24875/amh.m26000158
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedicle morphometry of the lumbar spine in a sample of the Mexican population, measured by computed tomography

Arturo García-Galicia, Jorge Loría-Castellanos, José Á. Parra-Salazar, D Benavides-Rodríguez et al.
Anales Médicos de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Pedicle morphometry of the lumbar spine in a sample of the Mexican population, measured by computed tomography

Arturo García-Galicia, Jorge Loría-Castellanos, José Á. Parra-Salazar, D Benavides-Rodríguez, Álvaro J. Montiel-Jarquín, Omar Catalán-Arizmendi, Nancy R. Bertado-Ramírez, Angélica Porras-Juárez, Sandra Maldonado-Castañeda
article en

Abstract

Background:The greatest purchase of a screw in the lumbar spine occurs in the pedicle.This makes it important to have the largest diameter possible without damaging its walls.Objective: The aim of the study was to determine lumbar pedicle parameters in a population sample from Mexico City, to properly select the screw for use in lumbar spine surgery.Material and methods: Sixty patients, aged 20-70 years, were evaluated.Computed tomography (CT) scans measured the internal and external cortical pedicle height, internal and external cortical pedicle width, and the convergence angle in each lumbar pedicle.Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine the difference between means by sex and segment.Results: The mean age was 51.7 and 49.7 years in men and women, respectively.In women, the internal cortical pedicle width was smaller from L1 to L4, and the internal cortical pedicle height was smaller at L5.In men, the inner cortical pedicle width was narrower from L1 to L3, and the inner cortical pedicle height was narrower at L4 and L5.The angle of convergence was narrower at L1 and gradually increased up to L5 in both men and women.Conclusions: In women, 5.0 mm screws are safe for L4 and L5, and 4.0 mm screws are safe for L1-L3.In men, 5.0 mm screws are safe for L1 and L2, and 5.5 mm screws are safe for L3.At L4 and L5, 5.5 mm screws are safe.

Anales Médicos de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABCVol. 71(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.