Hydrogen Mass Transfer in Anaerobic Biomethanation: A Comparative Study of Injection Strategies and Practical Limitations of Silicone Diffusion

Biological methanation of carbon dioxide (CO2) using hydrogen (H2) offers a promising route for upgrading biogas and storing renewable energy within existing gas infrastructures. However, the low solubility of H2 in aqueous systems remains a major bottleneck, limiting its bioavailability and overall conversion efficiency. In this study, three H2 delivery strategies—direct bubbling, sparging, and diffusion through submerged silicone tubing—were systematically compared in a lab-scale continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) to evaluate their relative mass-transfer performance. H2 addition via silicone tubing yielded substantially higher initial H2 mass-transfer rates than sparging and bubbling, with increases of approximately 3.8-fold and 5.3-fold, respectively, under the tested conditions. Based on these findings, silicone-based H2 delivery was applied in both in situ and ex situ configurations for biomethanation. In both setups, the methane (CH4) fraction in the biogas increased from approximately 48% to over 85% upon H2 addition, while no H2 accumulation in the reactor headspace was observed. Under the applied low organic loading conditions, biogas production remained stable, indicating that H2 addition did not adversely affect process performance within the investigated operational window. Overall, this study provides a comparative assessment of H2 delivery strategies and highlights the trade-off between mass-transfer performance and engineering feasibility. While silicone diffusion enhances H2 availability in anaerobic systems at the laboratory scale, extrapolating from the experimentally determined H2 flux suggests that an impractically large silicone surface area would be required for scale-up. This reflects a fundamental limitation of diffusion-based H2 delivery in stirred-tank reactors and underscores the need for alternative reactor concepts, such as dedicated ex situ systems or high-surface-area gas–liquid contactors. Despite extensive research on hydrogenotrophic methanation, quantitative links between H2 mass transfer, reactor design, and scalability remain insufficiently resolved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19153522
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrogen Mass Transfer in Anaerobic Biomethanation: A Comparative Study of Injection Strategies and Practical Limitations of Silicone Diffusion

Arjan Kloekhorst, Folkert Faber, Janneke Krooneman, Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink et al.
Energies
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

Hydrogen Mass Transfer in Anaerobic Biomethanation: A Comparative Study of Injection Strategies and Practical Limitations of Silicone Diffusion

Arjan Kloekhorst, Folkert Faber, Janneke Krooneman, Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, András Perl, Gert Hofstede, Kemal Koç
article en

Abstract

Biological methanation of carbon dioxide (CO2) using hydrogen (H2) offers a promising route for upgrading biogas and storing renewable energy within existing gas infrastructures. However, the low solubility of H2 in aqueous systems remains a major bottleneck, limiting its bioavailability and overall conversion efficiency. In this study, three H2 delivery strategies—direct bubbling, sparging, and diffusion through submerged silicone tubing—were systematically compared in a lab-scale continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) to evaluate their relative mass-transfer performance. H2 addition via silicone tubing yielded substantially higher initial H2 mass-transfer rates than sparging and bubbling, with increases of approximately 3.8-fold and 5.3-fold, respectively, under the tested conditions. Based on these findings, silicone-based H2 delivery was applied in both in situ and ex situ configurations for biomethanation. In both setups, the methane (CH4) fraction in the biogas increased from approximately 48% to over 85% upon H2 addition, while no H2 accumulation in the reactor headspace was observed. Under the applied low organic loading conditions, biogas production remained stable, indicating that H2 addition did not adversely affect process performance within the investigated operational window. Overall, this study provides a comparative assessment of H2 delivery strategies and highlights the trade-off between mass-transfer performance and engineering feasibility. While silicone diffusion enhances H2 availability in anaerobic systems at the laboratory scale, extrapolating from the experimentally determined H2 flux suggests that an impractically large silicone surface area would be required for scale-up. This reflects a fundamental limitation of diffusion-based H2 delivery in stirred-tank reactors and underscores the need for alternative reactor concepts, such as dedicated ex situ systems or high-surface-area gas–liquid contactors. Despite extensive research on hydrogenotrophic methanation, quantitative links between H2 mass transfer, reactor design, and scalability remain insufficiently resolved.

EnergiesVol. 19(15)
University of Groningen (NL), Hanze University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Nationaal Regieorgaan Praktijkgericht Onderzoek SIA
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.